Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):564-7.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0231.

Climate and land use change impacts on plant distributions in Germany

Affiliations

Climate and land use change impacts on plant distributions in Germany

Sven Pompe et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

We present niche-based modelling to project the distribution of 845 European plant species for Germany using three different models and three scenarios of climate and land use changes up to 2080. Projected changes suggested large effects over the coming decades, with consequences for the German flora. Even under a moderate scenario (approx. +2.2 degrees C), 15-19% (across models) of the species we studied could be lost locally-averaged from 2,995 grid cells in Germany. Models projected strong spatially varying impacts on the species composition. In particular, the eastern and southwestern parts of Germany were affected by species loss. Scenarios were characterized by an increased number of species occupying small ranges, as evidenced by changes in range-size rarity scores. It is anticipated that species with small ranges will be especially vulnerable to future climate change and other ecological stresses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentages of species (a) loss, (b) gain and (c) turnover from GLM (6′×10′) for the GRAS scenario for Germany. Modelled estimates of loss, gain, turnover across models (GLM, GAM and RF) showed high agreement (table S2 in the electronic supplementary material).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated change in SR (a) using no limitation in species dispersal and (b) with limitation in dispersal computed as difference between modelled future and current SR per grid cell (n=2995 grid cells, 845 species). White boxes, SEDG; light grey boxes, BAMBU; dark grey boxes, GRAS.

References

    1. Dormann C.F. Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2007;8:387–397. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2006.11.001 - DOI
    1. European Soil Database (v. 2.0) 2004 European Soil Bureau Network and the European Commission, EUR 19945 EN. See http://eusoils.jrc.it
    1. Heikkinen R.K, Luoto M, Araújo M.B, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes M.T. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2006;30:751–777. doi:10.1177/0309133306071957 - DOI
    1. Jalas J, Suominen J. The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo; Helsinki, Finland: 1972-2004. Atlas Florae Europaeae.
    1. Jetz W, Wilcove D.S, Dobson A.P. Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:1211–1219. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050157 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types