Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Aug 6;100(15):1082-91.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn224. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway

Solveig Hofvind et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Most screening mammography in the United States differs from that in countries with formal screening programs by having a shorter screening interval and interpretation by a single reader vs independent double reading. We examined how these differences affect early detection of breast cancer by comparing performance measures and histopathologic outcomes in women undergoing opportunistic screening in Vermont and organized screening in Norway.

Methods: We evaluated recall, screen detection, and interval cancer rates and prognostic tumor characteristics for women aged 50-69 years who underwent screening mammography in Vermont (n = 45 050) and in Norway (n = 194 430) from 1997 through 2003. Rates were directly adjusted for age by weighting the rates within 5-year age intervals to reflect the age distribution in the combined data and were compared using two-sided Z tests.

Results: The age-adjusted recall rate was 9.8% in Vermont and 2.7% in Norway (P < .001). The age-adjusted screen detection rate per 1000 woman-years after 2 years of follow-up was 2.77 in Vermont and 2.57 in Norway (P = .12), whereas the interval cancer rate per 1000 woman-years was 1.24 and 0.86, respectively (P < .001). Larger proportions of invasive interval cancers in Vermont than in Norway were 15 mm or smaller (55.9% vs 38.2%, P < .001) and had no lymph node involvement (67.5% vs 57%, P = .01). The prognostic characteristics of all invasive cancers (screen-detected and interval cancer) were similar in Vermont and Norway.

Conclusion: Screening mammography detected cancer at about the same rate and at the same prognostic stage in Norway and Vermont, with a statistically significantly lower recall rate in Norway. The interval cancer rate was higher in Vermont than in Norway, but tumors that were diagnosed in the Vermont women tended to be at an earlier stage than those diagnosed in the Norwegian women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Probability of interval cancer during the 2 years following a screening mammogram in Vermont and Norway. Dark solid lines indicate the cumulative probability of interval cancer for Vermont (blue) and Norway (orange) based on life table analysis; light solid lines correspond to 95% confidence intervals. At each time point, the estimated probability is based on the number of women remaining at risk. The corresponding dashed lines show the proportion of women who have not yet returned for their next screen and are thus still at risk for interval cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Houn F, Brown ML. Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities. Radiology. 1994;190(1):209–215. - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5 pt 1):344–346. - PubMed
    1. Hofvind S, Geller B, Vacek P, Thoresen S, Skaane P. Using the European Guidelines to evaluate the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(7):447–455. - PubMed
    1. Perry N, Broeders M, deWolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. [Printed in Belgium]. European Communities: 2006. http://bookshop.eu.int ISBN: 92-79-01258-4. Accessed January 15, 2008. - PubMed
    1. Ballard-Barbash R, Klabunde C, Paci E, et al. Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999;8(5):417–426. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms