Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Feb;19(2):120-34.
doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.2.3.

Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users

Affiliations

Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users

Kate Gfeller et al. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

The research examined whether performance by adult cochlear implant recipients on a variety of recognition and appraisal tests derived from real-world music could be predicted from technological, demographic, and life experience variables, as well as speech recognition scores. A representative sample of 209 adults implanted between 1985 and 2006 participated. Using multiple linear regression models and generalized linear mixed models, sets of optimal predictor variables were selected that effectively predicted performance on a test battery that assessed different aspects of music listening. These analyses established the importance of distinguishing between the accuracy of music perception and the appraisal of musical stimuli when using music listening as an index of implant success. Importantly, neither device type nor processing strategy predicted music perception or music appraisal. Speech recognition performance was not a strong predictor of music perception, and primarily predicted music perception when the test stimuli included lyrics. Additionally, limitations in the utility of speech perception in predicting musical perception and appraisal underscore the utility of music perception as an alternative outcome measure for evaluating implant outcomes. Music listening background, residual hearing (i.e., hearing aid use), cognitive factors, and some demographic factors predicted several indices of perceptual accuracy or appraisal of music.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relations between dependent variables and factors related to technical differences. The arrows indicate the presence of statistically significant relations between the dependent variables and predictor variables classified as technical differences. The p value is indicated by the type of arrow. NS indicates variables are not significant.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relations between dependent variables and factors related to individual differences. The arrows indicate the presence of statistically significant relations between the dependent variables and predictor variables classified as technical differences. The p value is indicated by the type of arrow. NS indicates variables are not significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relations between dependent variables and factors related to life experiences. The arrows indicate the presence of statistically significant relations between the dependent variables and predictor variables classified as technical differences. The p value is indicated by the type of arrow. NS indicates variables are not significant.

References

    1. Akaike H. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov VN, Csaki F, editors. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. 2. Budapest, Hungary: Akademia Kaido; 1973. pp. 267–281.
    1. Büchler M, Lai WK, Dillier N. Music perception with cochlear implants. Poster presented at ZNZ Symposium; Zurich. 2004. www.unizh.ch/orl/publications/
    1. Carpenter PA, Just MA, Shell P. What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychol Rev. 1990;97(3):404–431. - PubMed
    1. Cleary M, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI. Working memory spans as predictors of spoken word recognition and receptive vocabulary in children with cochlear implants. Volta Rev. 2002;102:259–280. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dillier N. Combining cochlear implants and hearing instruments. Proceedings of the Third International Pediatric Conference; Nov 2004; Chicago, IL, Phonak. 2004. pp. 163–172.

Publication types