Short gamete co-incubation during in vitro fertilization decreases the fertilization rate and does not improve embryo quality: a prospective auto controlled study
- PMID: 18670871
- PMCID: PMC2596678
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-008-9240-3
Short gamete co-incubation during in vitro fertilization decreases the fertilization rate and does not improve embryo quality: a prospective auto controlled study
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluate the effect of short gamete incubation on fertilization rate and embryo quality.
Methods: A prospective study has been performed. Two thousand five hundred and forty seven sibling oocytes from 240 couples undergoing IVF attempts were allocated to a short (1 h) or a standard (18 h) insemination procedure. Diploid fertilization rate (two pronuclei, 2PN), polyspermy (>2PN) and embryo quality were compared.
Results: The fertilization rate was statistically lower in the short insemination group compared to the standard insemination one (64.9% and 70.1%; P = 0.039), with a similar polyspermy rate observed between the two groups. A slight, but non significant, increase was observed concerning good embryo quality rate in the short insemination group when compared to the standard insemination, both at day 2 (60.1 vs. 58.1%; P = 0.06) and day 3 (53.2 vs. 48.5%; P = 0.22).
Conclusion: This new study highlights that a 1 h gamete exposure decreases the fertilization rate and does not improve embryo quality compared with a standard 18 h insemination procedure.
Figures
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1126/science.3027891', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3027891'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '3027891', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3027891/'}]}
- Wassarman PM. The biology and chemistry of fertilization. Science. 1987;235:553–60. doi:10.1126/science.3027891. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '2849808', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2849808/'}]}
- Wassarman PM. Fertilization in mammals. Sci Am. 1988;259:78–84. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8671180', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8671180/'}]}
- Gianaroli L, Cristina Magli M, Ferraretti AP, Fiorentino A, Tosti E, Panzella S, et al. Reducing the time of sperm–oocyte interaction in human in-vitro fertilization improves the implantation rate. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:166–71. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8981145', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8981145/'}]}
- Gianaroli L, Fiorentino A, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Montanaro N. Prolonged sperm–oocyte exposure and high sperm concentration affect human embryo viability and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2507–11. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '3558763', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3558763/'}]}
- Plachot M, Junca AM, Mandelbaum J, Cohen J, Salat-Baroux J, Da Lage C. Timing of in-vitro fertilization of cumulus-free and cumulus-enclosed human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1986;1:237–42. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
