Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2008 Nov;43(5):794-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Jul 4.

Small animal bone biomechanics

Editorial

Small animal bone biomechanics

Deepak Vashishth. Bone. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Animal models, in particular mice, offer the possibility of naturally achieving or genetically engineering a skeletal phenotype associated with disease and conducting destructive fracture tests on bone to determine the resulting change in bone's mechanical properties. Several recent developments, including nano- and micro-indentation testing, microtensile and microcompressive testing, and bending tests on notched whole bone specimens, offer the possibility to mechanically probe small animal bone and investigate the effects of aging, therapeutic treatments, disease, and genetic variation. In contrast to traditional strength tests on small animal bones, fracture mechanics tests display smaller variation and therefore offer the possibility of reducing sample sizes. This article provides an analysis of what such tests measure and proposes methods to reduce errors associated with testing smaller than ideal specimens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) µCT images of different mouse long bones at the midshaft region where notching and failure occur. (B) Testing setup showing largest possible span length for different mouse bones. (Reprinted from the Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 38. Schriefer J, Robling A, Warden S, Fournier A, Mason J and Turner C. A comparison of mechanical properties derived from multiple skeletal sites in mice. p.469 ©2005, with permission from Elsevier.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cross-sectional images of mice bone showing cortical thickness, endosteal and periosteal diameters measured at three diphyseal location using microCT (Scanco Viva CT).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ng AH, Wang SX, Turner CH, Beamer WG, Grynpas MD. Bone quality and bone strength in BXH recombinant inbred mice. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007 Sep;81(3):215–223. - PubMed
    1. Tang B, Ngan AH, Lu WW. An improved method for the measurement of mechanical properties of bone by nanoindentation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Sep;18(9):1875–1881. - PubMed
    1. Kavukcuoglu NB, Denhardt DT, Guzelsu N, Mann AB. Osteopontin deficiency and aging on nanomechanics of mouse bone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Oct;83(1):136–144. - PubMed
    1. Akhter MP, Fan Z, Rho JY. Bone intrinsic material properties in three inbred mouse strains. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004 Nov;75(5):416–420. - PubMed
    1. McNamara LM, Ederveen AG, Lyons CG, Price C, Schaffler MB, Weinans H, Prendergast PJ. Strength of cancellous bone trabecular tissue from normal, ovariectomized and drug-treated rats over the course of ageing. Bone. 2006 Aug;39(2):392–400. - PubMed

Publication types