Errors in patient specimen collection: application of statistical process control
- PMID: 18673352
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01824.x
Errors in patient specimen collection: application of statistical process control
Abstract
Background: Errors in the collection and labeling of blood samples for pretransfusion testing increase the risk of transfusion-associated patient morbidity and mortality. Statistical process control (SPC) is a recognized method to monitor the performance of a critical process. An easy-to-use SPC method was tested to determine its feasibility as a tool for monitoring quality in transfusion medicine.
Study design and methods: SPC control charts were adapted to a spreadsheet presentation. Data tabulating the frequency of mislabeled and miscollected blood samples from 10 hospitals in five countries from 2004 to 2006 were used to demonstrate the method. Control charts were produced to monitor process stability.
Results: The participating hospitals found the SPC spreadsheet very suitable to monitor the performance of the sample labeling and collection and applied SPC charts to suit their specific needs. One hospital monitored subcategories of sample error in detail. A large hospital monitored the number of wrong-blood-in-tube (WBIT) events. Four smaller-sized facilities, each following the same policy for sample collection, combined their data on WBIT samples into a single control chart. One hospital used the control chart to monitor the effect of an educational intervention.
Conclusion: A simple SPC method is described that can monitor the process of sample collection and labeling in any hospital. SPC could be applied to other critical steps in the transfusion processes as a tool for biovigilance and could be used to develop regional or national performance standards for pretransfusion sample collection. A link is provided to download the spreadsheet for free.
Similar articles
-
An international study of the performance of sample collection from patients.Vox Sang. 2003 Jul;85(1):40-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00313.x. Vox Sang. 2003. PMID: 12823729
-
Strict adherence to a blood bank specimen labeling policy by all clinical laboratories significantly reduces the incidence of "wrong blood in tube".Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Aug;132(2):164-8; quiz 306. doi: 10.1309/AJCPOJA2JRVX0IWC. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009. PMID: 19605809
-
Tubes for pretransfusion testing should be collected by blood bank staff and hand labelled until the implementation of new technology for improved sample labelling. Results of a prospective study.Vox Sang. 2008 Jul;95(1):52-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01049.x. Epub 2008 Apr 2. Vox Sang. 2008. PMID: 18393947
-
Wrong blood in tube - potential for serious outcomes: can it be prevented?Br J Haematol. 2015 Jan;168(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13137. Epub 2014 Oct 4. Br J Haematol. 2015. PMID: 25284036 Review.
-
Using standard desk-top tools to monitor medical error rates.Semin Nurse Manag. 2002 Jun;10(2):95-9. Semin Nurse Manag. 2002. PMID: 12092273 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of comprehensive check at the blood bank reception on blood requisitions in detecting potential transfusion errors.Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2015 Jun;31(2):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s12288-014-0444-7. Epub 2014 Aug 17. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2015. PMID: 25825571 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular immunohaematology round table discussions at the AABB Annual Meeting, Philadelphia 2014.Blood Transfus. 2016 Sep;14(5):425-33. doi: 10.2450/2015.0130-15. Epub 2015 Dec 21. Blood Transfus. 2016. PMID: 26710354 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Use of an identification system based on biometric data for patients requiring transfusions guarantees transfusion safety and traceability.Blood Transfus. 2009 Jul;7(3):193-203. doi: 10.2450/2009.0067-08. Blood Transfus. 2009. PMID: 19657483 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical