Accounting for measurement error: a critical but often overlooked process
- PMID: 18674753
- DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.04.010
Accounting for measurement error: a critical but often overlooked process
Abstract
Aims: Due to instrument imprecision and human inconsistencies, measurements are not free of error. Technical error of measurement (TEM) is the variability encountered between dimensions when the same specimens are measured at multiple sessions. A goal of a data collection regimen is to minimise TEM. The few studies that actually quantify TEM, regardless of discipline, report that it is substantial and can affect results and inferences. This paper reviews some statistical approaches for identifying and controlling TEM. Statistically, TEM is part of the residual ('unexplained') variance in a statistical test, so accounting for TEM, which requires repeated measurements, enhances the chances of finding a statistically significant difference if one exists.
Methods: The aim of this paper was to review and discuss common statistical designs relating to types of error and statistical approaches to error accountability. This paper addresses issues of landmark location, validity, technical and systematic error, analysis of variance, scaled measures and correlation coefficients in order to guide the reader towards correct identification of true experimental differences.
Conclusions: Researchers commonly infer characteristics about populations from comparatively restricted study samples. Most inferences are statistical and, aside from concerns about adequate accounting for known sources of variation with the research design, an important source of variability is measurement error. Variability in locating landmarks that define variables is obvious in odontometrics, cephalometrics and anthropometry, but the same concerns about measurement accuracy and precision extend to all disciplines. With increasing accessibility to computer-assisted methods of data collection, the ease of incorporating repeated measures into statistical designs has improved. Accounting for this technical source of variation increases the chance of finding biologically true differences when they exist.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.AANA J. 1996 Jun;64(3):261-8. AANA J. 1996. PMID: 9095698 Review.
-
Random errors in anthropometry.J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1996 Dec;25(2):155-66. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1996. PMID: 9735595
-
Impact of measurement error in the study of sexually transmitted infections.Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Aug;80(4):318-23, 328. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.006536. Sex Transm Infect. 2004. PMID: 15295134 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania.J Forensic Sci. 2008 Jul;53(4):782-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00751.x. J Forensic Sci. 2008. PMID: 18537868
-
Brief communication: measurement size, precision, and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: bigger is better.Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993 Apr;90(4):495-500. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330900409. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1993. PMID: 8476006
Cited by
-
Labio-lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self-ligating brackets.Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):691-7. doi: 10.2319/071212-575.1. Epub 2012 Dec 18. Angle Orthod. 2013. PMID: 23249256 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Surgically assisted maxillary expansion with or without pterygoid disjunction alters maxillomandibular positioning.Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun;27(2):269-281. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01062-1. Epub 2022 Apr 15. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023. PMID: 35426586
-
Dental arch response to Haas-type rapid maxillary expansion anchored to deciduous vs permanent molars: A multicentric randomized controlled trial.Angle Orthod. 2015 Jul;85(4):570-6. doi: 10.2319/041114-269.1. Epub 2014 Oct 14. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25314034 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
In vivo facial soft tissue depths of a modern adult population from Germany.Int J Legal Med. 2017 Sep;131(5):1455-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1581-y. Epub 2017 Apr 17. Int J Legal Med. 2017. PMID: 28417258
-
Validation of a digital, partly automated three-dimensional cast analysis for evaluation of orthodontic treatment assessment.Head Face Med. 2025 May 8;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00515-8. Head Face Med. 2025. PMID: 40341057 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources