[Orthopaedic treatment of extraarticular condylar fractures of the mandible: retrospective study of 39 unilateral cases]
- PMID: 18674788
- DOI: 10.1016/j.stomax.2008.05.005
[Orthopaedic treatment of extraarticular condylar fractures of the mandible: retrospective study of 39 unilateral cases]
Abstract
Introduction: Although for an increasing number of authors open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is becoming the standard of care for mandibular subcondylar fractures, functional treatment is still performed worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of functional treatment in isolated mandibular subcondylar fractures.
Material and methods: Patients presenting with an isolated low subcondylar fracture between 1998 and 2004 were enrolled in a retrospective study. We focused on the epidemiology, type of fracture, degree of displacement, treatment protocol and short-term outcome. Patients were interviewed to evaluate long-term results.
Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. The mean displacement was 15 degrees of medial angulation and a shortening of the ramus ranging around 5mm. Thirty-one patients recovered normal mandibular function (mouth opening more than 45 mm, with no or minimal deviation). Sixteen presented with TMJ disorders, deemed minor by the patients themselves. None of them required any specific treatment. Eighteen had posttraumatic occlusal discomfort corrected by dentistry or prosthetic adaptation. Long-term follow-up X-rays showed minor residual condylar displacement. In all cases, patients estimated their treatment acceptable.
Discussion: The orthopedic treatment of low subcondylar fractures provides acceptable functional results. This technique is simple, safe and remains a valuable therapeutic option. In the future, experience with surgical management will probably lead to specific indications of both closed and open methods.
Similar articles
-
Open reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment and mandibulomaxillary fixation of fractures of the mandibular condylar process: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study with special evaluation of fracture level.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;66(12):2537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.107. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. PMID: 19022134 Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical treatment of sagittal fracture of mandibular condyle using long-screw osteosynthesis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):1988-94. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.020. Epub 2011 Feb 3. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21292375
-
Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Apr;59(4):370-5; discussion 375-6. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.21868. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001. PMID: 11289165
-
A protocol for the treatment of mandibular condylar fractures.Minerva Stomatol. 2004 Jul-Aug;53(7-8):403-15. Minerva Stomatol. 2004. PMID: 15278019 Review. English, Italian.
-
Closed versus open reduction of mandibular condylar fractures in adults: a meta-analysis.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1087-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.025. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18486771 Review.
Cited by
-
Retraction force necessary to expose the mandibular neck in Risdon and high cervical anteroparotid transmasseteric approaches: an anatomic comparative study.Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Oct;39(10):1079-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00276-017-1853-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017. PMID: 28429040
-
When trauma bites back: a systematic review on direct orofacial macrotrauma and temporomandibular disorders.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06095-2. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 39739135
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources