Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center
- PMID: 18675084
- DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.016
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center
Abstract
Since February 2002, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) proposed to adopt a modified version of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) to assign priority on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study, we evaluated the impact of MELD score on liver allocation in a single center series of 198 liver recipients (mean age of patients, 52.21+/-8.92 years), considering the relationship between clinical urgency derived from MELD score (overall MELD, 18.7+/-6.83; MELD <15 in 69 patients, MELD >or=15 in 129 patients) and geographical distribution of cadaveric donors (inside/outside Liguria Region, 125/73). The waiting time for OLT was 230+/-248 days, whereas the 3-month and 1-year patient survivals were 87.37% and 79.79%, respectively. No difference was observed for MELD score retrospectively calculated for patients who underwent OLT before February 2002 (n=71) compared with MELD score calculated for patients who received a liver thereafter (18.26+/-6.68 vs 18.94+/-6.92; P= .504). No significant difference was found in waiting time before and after adoption of MELD score (213+/-183 vs 238+/-278 days; P= .500), or by stratifying patients for MELD <15/>or=15 (225+/-234 vs 232+/-256 days; P= .851). Using the geographical distribution of donors as a grouping variable (outside vs inside Liguria Region), no significance occurred for MELD score (19.68+/-7.42 vs 18.17+/-6.42; P= .135) or waiting time (211+/-226 vs 242+/-261 days; P= .394). In our series, more OLTs were performed among sicker patients and no differences were found in the management of livers procured from cadaveric donors outside or inside Liguria Region. However, further efforts are needed to reduce the waiting time among patients with higher MELD scores.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in a liver transplantation waiting list.Transplant Proc. 2007 Oct;39(8):2511-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.023. Transplant Proc. 2007. PMID: 17954160
-
Survival on waiting list for liver transplantation before and after introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease score.Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.005. Transplant Proc. 2010. PMID: 20304152
-
Overview of the MELD score and the UNOS adult liver allocation system.Transplant Proc. 2007 Dec;39(10):3169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.04.025. Transplant Proc. 2007. PMID: 18089345
-
Patient selection criteria for liver transplantation.Minerva Chir. 2003 Oct;58(5):635-48. Minerva Chir. 2003. PMID: 14603144 Review.
-
[The value of MELD in the allocation of priority for liver transplantation candidates].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;33(4):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jul 23. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 19631411 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Factors Associated with Mortality and Graft Failure in Liver Transplants: A Hierarchical Approach.PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134874. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26274497 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical