Ovarian follicular flushing among low-responding patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology
- PMID: 18675970
- PMCID: PMC2745125
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.034
Ovarian follicular flushing among low-responding patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology
Abstract
A randomized comparison trial was performed to evaluate whether follicular reaspiration with use of a double-lumen retrieval needle improves oocyte recovery when compared with direct follicular aspiration among low-responding patients undergoing ART. There were no differences observed in the number of oocytes retrieved (single lumen: 6.5 +/- 2.2 oocytes, double lumen: 7.2 +/- 2.3 oocytes) whereas follicular reaspiration with the double-lumen retrieval needle resulted in a twofold increase in procedure time.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Gembruch U, Diedrich K, Welker B, Wahode J, van der Ven H, Al-Hasani S, et al. Transvaginal sonographically guided oocyte retrieval for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1988;3 (Suppl 2):59–63. - PubMed
-
- Wikland M, Enk L, Hamberger L. Transvesical and transvaginal approaches for the aspiration of follicles by use of ultrasound. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1985;442:182–94. - PubMed
-
- Ludwig AK, Glawatz M, Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Perioperative and post-operative complications of transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval: prospective study of >1000 oocyte retrievals. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3235–40. - PubMed
-
- Knight DC, Tyler JP, Driscoll GL. Follicular flushing at oocyte retrieval: a reappraisal. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;41:210–3. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical