Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 18676897
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01108
Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly utilized to reduce health-care costs; however, with a shorter hospital stay, the possibility arises for an increase in adverse clinical outcomes. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost of care of home-based compared with inpatient rehabilitation following primary total hip or knee joint replacement.
Methods: We randomized 234 patients, using block randomization techniques, to either home-based or inpatient rehabilitation following total joint replacement. All patients followed standardized care pathways and were evaluated, with use of validated outcome measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], Short Form-36, and patient satisfaction), prior to surgery and at three and twelve months following surgery. The primary outcome was the WOMAC function score at three months after surgery.
Results: The mean length of stay (and standard deviation) in the acute care hospital was 6.3 +/- 2.5 days for the group designated for inpatient rehabilitation prior to transfer to that facility compared with 7.0 +/- 3.0 days for the home-based rehabilitation group prior to discharge home (p = 0.06). The mean length of stay in inpatient rehabilitation was 17.7 +/- 8.6 days. The mean number of postoperative home-based rehabilitation visits was eight. The prevalence of postoperative complications up to twelve months postoperatively was similar in both groups, which each had a 2% rate of dislocation and a 3% rate of clinically important deep venous thrombosis. The prevalence of infection was 0% in the home-based group and 2% in the inpatient group. None of these differences was clinically important. Both groups showed substantial improvements at three and twelve months, with no significant differences between the groups with respect to WOMAC, Short Form-36, or patient satisfaction scores (p > 0.05). The total episode-of-care costs (in Canadian dollars) for the inpatient rehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation arms were $14,532 and $11,082, respectively (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: Despite concerns about early hospital discharge, there was no difference in pain, functional outcomes, or patient satisfaction between the group that received home-based rehabilitation and the group that had inpatient rehabilitation. On the basis of our findings, we recommend the use of a home-based rehabilitation protocol following elective primary total hip or knee replacement as it is the more cost-effective strategy.
Similar articles
-
Determinants and outcomes of inpatient versus home based rehabilitation following elective hip and knee replacement.J Rheumatol. 2000 Jul;27(7):1753-8. J Rheumatol. 2000. PMID: 10914863
-
Physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee or hip replacement: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(8):1-91. Epub 2005 Jun 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005. PMID: 23074477 Free PMC article.
-
Selection of patients for inpatient rehabilitation or direct home discharge following total joint replacement surgery: a comparison of health status and out-of-pocket expenditure of patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.Chronic Illn. 2005 Dec;1(4):289-302. doi: 10.1177/17423953050010041101. Chronic Illn. 2005. PMID: 17152453
-
Assessment of Outcomes of Inpatient or Clinic-Based vs Home-Based Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192810. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2810. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31026026 Free PMC article.
-
Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4836. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 24814600 Review.
Cited by
-
Variation in rehabilitation setting after uncomplicated total knee or hip arthroplasty: a call for evidence-based guidelines.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 15;20(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2570-8. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 31092230 Free PMC article.
-
[Total hip and knee arthroplasty : Results of outpatient orthopedic rehabilitation].Orthopade. 2015 Mar;44(3):203-11. doi: 10.1007/s00132-014-3000-0. Orthopade. 2015. PMID: 25209014 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios for minimally invasive surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis relative to failed medical management compared with total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.Can J Surg. 2021 Jul 23;64(4):E391-E402. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015719. Can J Surg. 2021. PMID: 34296707 Free PMC article.
-
Outpatient physical therapy bundled payment models are feasible for total hip arthroplasty patients: an evaluation of utilization, cost and outcomes.Arthroplasty. 2023 May 12;5(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00179-2. Arthroplasty. 2023. PMID: 37170151 Free PMC article.
-
Cost, time savings and effectiveness of wearable devices for remote monitoring of patient rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 27;18(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03898-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37370130 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical