The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings
- PMID: 18677070
- DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0060
The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings
Abstract
Publicly funded family planning clinics serve millions of low-income women each year, providing a range of critical preventive services and enabling women to avoid unintended pregnancies. It is important to quantify the impact and cost-effectiveness of such services, in addition to these health benefits. Using a methodology similar to prior cost-benefit analyses, we estimated the numbers of unintended pregnancies prevented by all U.S. publicly funded family planning clinics in 2004, nationally (1.4 million pregnancies) and for each state. We also compared the actual costs of providing these services ($1.4 billion) with the anticipated public-sector costs for maternity and infant care among the Medicaid-eligible women whose births were averted ($5.7 billion) to calculate net public-sector savings ($4.3 billion). Thus, public expenditures for family planning care not only help women to achieve their childbearing goals, but they also save public dollars: Our calculations indicate that for every $1 spent, $4.02 is saved.
Similar articles
-
Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Sep-Oct;28(5):188-95. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8886761
-
The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.Fam Plann Perspect. 1981 May-Jun;13(3):117-8, 120-4. Fam Plann Perspect. 1981. PMID: 6788597
-
The availability and use of publicly funded family planning clinics: U.S. trends, 1994-2001.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):206-15. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.206.04. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004. PMID: 15519963
-
Medical barriers to effective contraception.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007 Mar;34(1):19-29, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.01.003. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 17472862 Review.
-
Unintended pregnancies: a call for nursing action.MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):24-30; quiz 31. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003. PMID: 12514353 Review.
Cited by
-
Family planning in India: The way forward.Indian J Med Res. 2018 Dec;148(Suppl):S1-S9. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2067_17. Indian J Med Res. 2018. PMID: 30964076 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Introduction to the Supplement: Development of Federal Recommendations for Family Planning Services.Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2 Suppl 1):S1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.028. Am J Prev Med. 2015. PMID: 26190840 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Prenatal care and subsequent birth intervals.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Mar;44(1):13-21. doi: 10.1363/4401312. Epub 2012 Jan 30. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012. PMID: 22405147 Free PMC article.
-
Health insurance coverage and use of family planning services among current and former foster youth: implications of the health care reform law.J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Apr;38(2):421-39. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1966360. Epub 2012 Dec 21. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013. PMID: 23262773 Free PMC article.
-
New clinical performance measures for contraceptive care: their importance to healthcare quality.Contraception. 2017 Sep;96(3):149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 5. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 28596123 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical