Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2008 Jul 16:(3):CD000551.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000551.pub2.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

Yan Gong et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

  • Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis.
    Rudic JS, Poropat G, Krstic MN, Bjelakovic G, Gluud C. Rudic JS, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD000551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000551.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 23235576 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Primary biliary cirrhosis is an uncommon autoimmune liver disease with unknown aetiology. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been used for primary biliary cirrhosis, but the effects remain controversial.

Objectives: To evaluate the benefits and harms of UDCA on patients with primary biliary cirrhosis against placebo or no intervention.

Search strategy: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCI-EXPANDED, The Chinese Biomedical CD Database, LILACS, and the references of identified studies. The last search was performed in January 2007.

Selection criteria: Randomised clinical trials evaluating UDCA versus placebo or no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Data collection and analysis: The primary outcomes were mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) or relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as weighted mean difference, all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-regression was used to investigate the associations between UDCA effects and quality of the trial, UDCA dose, trial duration, and patient's severity of primary biliary cirrhosis. We also used Bayesian meta-analytic approach to estimate the UDCA effect as sensitivity analysis.

Main results: Sixteen randomised clinical trials evaluating UDCA against placebo or no intervention were identified. Data from three trials have been updated. Nearly half of the trials had high risk of bias. The combined results demonstrated no significant effects favouring UDCA on mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.42) and mortality or liver transplantation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.21). The findings were supported by the Bayesian meta-analyses. UDCA did not improve pruritus, fatigue, autoimmune conditions, liver histology, or portal pressure. UDCA seemed to improve biochemical variables, like serum bilirubin, ascites, and jaundice, but the findings were based on few trials with sparse data. The use of UDCA is significantly associated with adverse events, mainly weight gain.

Authors' conclusions: This systematic review did not demonstrate any benefit of UDCA on mortality and mortality or liver transplantation of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The few beneficial effects could not be due to random errors or outcome reporting bias.

PubMed Disclaimer

Update of

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources