Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2008;147(7):392-5.

[Is the assessment of serum creatinine reliable?]

[Article in Czech]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 18678099
Case Reports

[Is the assessment of serum creatinine reliable?]

[Article in Czech]
K Kotaska et al. Cas Lek Cesk. 2008.

Abstract

Chemical and enzymatic methods are used to measure creatinine in serum and urine. Chemical methods are mostly based on the reaction of creatinine with alkaline picrate (Jaffe reaction). The Jaffe reaction is not specific for creatinine, the same reaction resulting in Jaffe-like chromogens show many interfering substances (ascorbic acid, bilirubin, proteins, ketones, cephalosporins and other drugs). Chemical and enzymatic methods show similar accuracy and day-to-day precision. Chemical methods are cheaper than enzymatic methods. Enzymatic methods require low sample volume and are not affected by the interfering substances as the chemical methods. Presented case report shows an unusual occurrence of drug interference in the enzymatic creatine deaminase procedure. Biological factors (circadian rhythm, pregnancy, hemodialysis, transplantation, stress, exercise), analytical and preanalytical factors (pH, glucose, pyruvate, bilirubin, fatty acids, sample storage and sample collection - gel tubes) and biological variability of creatinine play significant role in the creatinine examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

MeSH terms