Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 18678846
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00009
Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin cancer in men in the United States, and prostate cancer screening has increased in recent years. In 2002, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded that evidence was insufficient to recommend for or against screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.
Purpose: To examine new evidence on benefits and harms of screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer with PSA.
Data sources: English-language articles identified in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (search dates, January 2002 to July 2007), reference lists of retrieved articles, and expert suggestions.
Study selection: Randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses of PSA screening and cross-sectional and cohort studies of screening harms and of the natural history of screening-detected cancer were selected to answer the following questions: Does screening for prostate cancer with PSA, as a single-threshold test or as a function of multiple tests over time, decrease morbidity or mortality? What are the magnitude and nature of harms associated with prostate cancer screening, other than overtreatment? What is the natural history of PSA-detected, nonpalpable, localized prostate cancer?
Data extraction: Studies were reviewed, abstracted, and rated for quality by using predefined U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria.
Data synthesis: No good-quality randomized, controlled trials of screening for prostate cancer have been completed. In 1 cross-sectional and 2 prospective cohort studies of fair to good quality, false-positive PSA screening results caused psychological adverse effects for up to 1 year after the test. The natural history of PSA-detected prostate cancer is poorly understood.
Limitations: Few eligible studies were identified. Long-term adverse effects of false-positive PSA screening test results are unknown.
Conclusion: Prostate-specific antigen screening is associated with psychological harms, and its potential benefits remain uncertain.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen testing: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):I37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18678840 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug. Report No.: 08-05121-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Aug. Report No.: 08-05121-EF-1. PMID: 20722160 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):185-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18678845
-
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29801017
-
Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 6;155(11):762-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-11-201112060-00375. Epub 2011 Oct 7. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21984740 Review.
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen testing: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):I37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18678840 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Population-based patterns and predictors of prostate-specific antigen screening among older men in the United States.J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1736-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9004. Epub 2011 Mar 28. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21444863 Free PMC article.
-
Liquid biopsies: the future of cancer early detection.J Transl Med. 2023 Feb 11;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-03960-8. J Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 36774504 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How Much Information Do Icelandic Men Receive on Pros and Cons of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Prior to Undergoing Testing?Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221097805. doi: 10.1177/15579883221097805. Am J Mens Health. 2022. PMID: 35608380 Free PMC article.
-
Remaining Life Expectancy Measurement and PSA Screening of Older Men.J Geriatr Oncol. 2012 Jul 1;3(3):196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2012.02.003. J Geriatr Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22773938 Free PMC article.
-
Does variation in either age at start of therapy or duration of therapy make chemoprevention with finasteride cost-effective?Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Dec;15(4):380-5. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2012.26. Epub 2012 Jul 10. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012. PMID: 22777393 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous