Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V
- PMID: 18686026
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9
Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V
Abstract
The term pedophilia denotes the erotic preference for prepubescent children. The term hebephilia has been proposed to denote the erotic preference for pubescent children (roughly, ages 11 or 12-14), but it has not become widely used. The present study sought to validate the concept of hebephilia by examining the agreement between self-reported sexual interests and objectively recorded penile responses in the laboratory. The participants were 881 men who were referred for clinical assessment because of paraphilic, criminal, or otherwise problematic sexual behavior. Within-group comparisons showed that men who verbally reported maximum sexual attraction to pubescent children had greater penile responses to depictions of pubescent children than to depictions of younger or older persons. Between-groups comparisons showed that penile responding distinguished such men from those who reported maximum attraction to prepubescent children and from those who reported maximum attraction to fully grown persons. These results indicated that hebephilia exists as a discriminable erotic age-preference. The authors recommend various ways in which the DSM might be altered to accommodate the present findings. One possibility would be to replace the diagnosis of Pedophilia with Pedohebephilia and allow the clinician to specify one of three subtypes: Sexually Attracted to Children Younger than 11 (Pedophilic Type), Sexually Attracted to Children Age 11-14 (Hebephilic Type), or Sexually Attracted to Both (Pedohebephilic Type). We further recommend that the DSM-V encourage users to record the typical age of children who most attract the patient sexually as well as the gender of children who most attract the patient sexually.
Comment in
-
Manufacturing mental disorder by pathologizing erotic age orientation: a comment on Blanchard et al. (2008).Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):328; author reply 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9426-x. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 18923890 No abstract available.
-
The public policy implications of "hebephilia": a response to Blanchard et al. (2008).Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):319-20; author reply 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9425-y. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 18923891 No abstract available.
-
Are there "hebephiles" among us? A response to Blanchard et al. (2008).Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):326-7; author reply 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9423-0. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 18923892 No abstract available.
-
Should hebephilia be a mental disorder? A reply to Blanchard et al. (2008).Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):317-8; author reply 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9422-1. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 18925429 No abstract available.
-
Adult sexual attraction to early-stage adolescents: phallometry doesn't equal pathology.Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):329-30; author reply 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9428-8. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 18931899 No abstract available.
-
When is an unusual sexual interest a mental disorder?Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):323-5; author reply 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9436-8. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 18946730 No abstract available.
-
Hebephilia plethysmographica: a partial rejoinder to Blanchard et al. (2008).Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):321-2; author reply 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9479-5. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 19219544 No abstract available.
-
Sexual preference for 14-year-olds as a mental disorder: you can't be serious!!Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Jun;39(3):585-6. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9602-7. Arch Sex Behav. 2010. PMID: 20204488 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
