The effects of weighting the "mean defect" visual field index according to threshold variability in the central and midperipheral visual field

Abstract

Two visual field indices, the mean defect (MD) of Flammer and the mean deviation (MD) of Heijl, have found wide acceptance among perimetrists. We compared these indices in 169 visual fields from normal- and high-tension glaucomatous eyes. Visual field damage in these eyes varied from slight to severe. In computations of the mean deviation index, the threshold values are weighted by the threshold deviations obtained from normal eyes as a function of eccentricity. However, the present study shows that the differences between the two indices in the population studied are negligible. Thus, subsequent interpretation is not affected by the choice of index, and the two MD indices may be considered to be interchangeable for the types of visual fields used in this study and for program-G1 examinations carried out using Octopus automated perimeters. Since we found smaller increases in local intersubjective fluctuations as a function of eccentricity in 274 normal visual fields as compared with results published by others, caution is indicated for interpretation of the visual field using probability weighting.