Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct;213(4):383-90.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00965.x. Epub 2008 Aug 6.

Moment arms of the muscles crossing the anatomical shoulder

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Moment arms of the muscles crossing the anatomical shoulder

David C Ackland et al. J Anat. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine the instantaneous moment arms of 18 major muscle sub-regions crossing the glenohumeral joint during coronal-plane abduction and sagittal-plane flexion. Muscle moment-arm data for sub-regions of the shoulder musculature during humeral elevation are currently not available. The tendon-excursion method was used to measure instantaneous muscle moment arms in eight entire upper-extremity cadaver specimens. Significant differences in moment arms were reported across sub-regions of the deltoid, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, subscapularis, infraspinatus and supraspinatus (P < 0.01). The most effective abductors were the middle and anterior deltoid, whereas the most effective adductors were the teres major, middle and inferior latissimus dorsi (lumbar vertebrae and iliac crest fibers, respectively), and middle and inferior pectoralis major (sternal and lower-costal fibers, respectively). In flexion, the superior pectoralis major (clavicular fibers), anterior and posterior supraspinatus, and anterior deltoid were the most effective flexors, whereas the teres major and posterior deltoid had the largest extensor moment arms. Division of multi-pennate shoulder muscles of broad origins into sub-regions highlighted distinct functional differences across those sub-regions. Most significantly, we found that the superior sub-region of the pectoralis major had the capacity to exert substantial torque in flexion, whereas the middle and inferior sub-regions tended to behave as a stabilizer and extensor, respectively. Knowledge of moment arm differences between muscle sub-regions may assist in identifying the functional effects of muscle sub-region tears, assist surgeons in planning tendon reconstructive surgery, and aid in the development and validation of biomechanical computer models used in implant design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Specimen mounted on the dynamic shoulder cadaver testing apparatus (DSCTA). Triads of retro-reflective markers were rigidly attached to the humerus and scapula to enable three-dimensional measurement of shoulder joint kinematics during abduction and flexion. Retro-reflective markers were also attached to 10-N weights hung from nylon lines to measure changes in muscle-tendon lengths during shoulder joint movement.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of the DSCTA used to measure muscle moment arms in this study. Symbols appearing in the diagram are as follows: M, 10-N free weight; RRF, retro-reflective marker used to measure tendon excursion; TS, tendon suture; SM, scapular marker triad; HM, humeral marker triad; P, pulley; MLA, muscle line-of-action; PB, scapula potting block; RF, rotary frame of the DSCTA. The scapula potting block and pulley are rigidly fixed to the rotary frame.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Moment arms of the teres major. Black line shows data for abduction, and gray lines indicate flexion.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Moment arms of sub-regions of the rotator cuff muscles: supraspinatus (A); subscapularis (B); infraspinatus and teres minor (C). Black lines show data for abduction, and gray lines indicate flexion.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Moment arms of sub-regions of the pectoralis major (A), latissimus dorsi (B), and deltoid (C). Black lines show data for abduction, and gray lines indicate flexion.
Fig. A1
Fig. A1
Coordinate systems of the scapula (A) and humerus (B) and associated digitized landmarks. Symbols appearing in the diagram are as follows: HH, the center of the humeral head; ME, medial humeral epicondyle; LE, lateral humeral epicondyle; MB, medial border of the scapula; AC, acromioclavicular joint. In the diagram, Xscap and Xhum are directed laterally, Yscap and Yhum are directed anteriorly, and Zscap and Zhum are directed superiorly.

References

    1. An KN, Takahashi K, Harrigan TP, Chao EY. Determination of muscle orientations and moment arms. J Biomech Eng. 1984;106:280–282. - PubMed
    1. Anglin C, Wyss UP, Pichora DR. Glenohumeral contact forces. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2000;214:637–644. - PubMed
    1. Apreleva M, Hasselman CT, Debski RE, et al. A dynamic analysis of glenohumeral motion after simulated capsulolabral injury. A cadaver model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:474–480. - PubMed
    1. Basmajian J. The upper limb. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1984. Muscles Alive.
    1. Charlton IW, Johnson GR. Application of spherical and cylindrical wrapping algorithms in a musculoskeletal model of the upper limb. J Biomech. 2001;34:1209–1216. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources