Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography
- PMID: 18691580
- PMCID: PMC2581902
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.083
Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography
Abstract
Background & aims: Colorectal cancer screening with diagnostic imaging can detect polyps. The management of patients whose largest polyp is less than 10 mm is uncertain. The primary aim of this study was to determine rates of advanced histology in patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening whose largest polyp is 9 mm or less.
Methods: Subjects include all asymptomatic adults receiving colonoscopy for screening during 2005 from 17 practice sites, which provide both colonoscopy and pathology reports to the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative repository. Patients were classified by size of largest polyp. Advanced histology was defined as an adenoma with villous or serrated histology, high-grade dysplasia, or an invasive cancer. Risk factors for advanced histology were determined using Pearson chi(2) and Fisher exact tests.
Results: Among 13,992 asymptomatic patients who had screening colonoscopy, 6360 patients (45%) had polyps, with complete histology available in 5977 (94%) patients. The proportion with advanced histology was 1.7% in the 1- to 5-mm group, 6.6% in the 6- to 9-mm group, 30.6% in the greater than 10-mm group, and 72.1% in the tumor group. Distal location was associated with advanced histology in the 6- to 9-mm group (P = .04) and in the greater than 10-mm group (P = .002).
Conclusions: One in 15 asymptomatic patients whose largest polyp is 6 to 9 mm will have advanced histology and would undergo surveillance at 3 years based on current guidelines. Because histology is necessary for this decision, most of these patients should be offered colonoscopy. Further study should determine whether patients whose largest polyp is 1-5 mm can be safely followed without polypectomy.
Comment in
-
Advanced neoplasia detection rates at colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography.Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar;136(3):1121-2; author reply 122-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.062. Epub 2009 Jan 22. Gastroenterology. 2009. PMID: 19167389 No abstract available.
References
-
- Baneerjee S, VanDam J. CT colonography for colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:121–133. - PubMed
-
- Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G VACSP Group # 380. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymtomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–168. - PubMed
-
- Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GR, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169–174. - PubMed
-
- Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysiliwiec PA, Schindler WR. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191–2200. - PubMed
-
- Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A, Dobhan R, Eastone J, Coyle W, Kikendall JW, Kim HM, Weiss DG, Emory T, Schatzkin A, Lieberman D. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2061–2068. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
