Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Oct 11:2007:354-8.

Decision theoretic analysis of improving epidemic detection

Affiliations

Decision theoretic analysis of improving epidemic detection

Masoumeh T Izadi et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. .

Abstract

The potentially catastrophic impact of an epidemic specially these due to bioterrorist attack, makes developing effective detection methods essential for public health. Current detection methods trade off reliability of alarms for early detection of outbreaks. The performance of these methods can be improved by disease-specific modeling techniques that take into account the potential costs and effects of an attack to provide optimal warnings and the cost and effectiveness of interventions. We study this optimization problem in the framework of sequential decision making under uncertainty. Our approach relies on estimating the future benefit of true alarms and the costs of false alarms. Using these quantities it identifies optimal decisions regarding the credibility of outputs from a traditional detection method at each point in time. The key contribution of this paper is to apply Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) on outbreak detection methods for improving alarm function in the case of anthrax. We present empirical evidence illustrating that at a fixed specificity, the performance of detection methods with respect to sensitivity and timeliness is improved significantly by utilizing POMDPs in detection of anthrax attacks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The POMDP model for anthrax outbreak detection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The estimate of accumulative preventable loss for detection of anthrax per day after a release.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The timeliness of anthrax outbreak detection method with and without using POMDPs: sensitivities during different days of the outbreak for attacks that resulted in 10 additional visits.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The timeliness of anthrax outbreak detection method with and without using POMDPs: sensitivities during different days of the outbreak for attacks that resulted in 20 additional visits.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adamou Christina, Cooper Gregory F, Wong Weng-Keen, Dowling John N, Hogan William R. Modeling Clinician Detection Time of a Disease Outbreak Due to Inhalational Anthrax. Advances in Disease Surveillance. 2006;1(3)
    1. Benenson AS, editor. Control of communicable diseases manual. 16th ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association; 1995.
    1. Box George E, Jenkins Gwilym M. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day; San Fransisco: 1976.
    1. Braithwaite Scott, Fridsma Douglas, Roberts Mark. The cost-effectiveness of strategies to reduce mortality from an intentional release of aerosolized anthrax spores. Medical Decision Making. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):182–93. - PubMed
    1. Buckeridge David L, Owens Douglas K, Switzer Paul, Frank John, Musen Mark A. Evaluating Detection of an Inhalational Anthrax Outbreak. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2006 Dec;12(12):1942–1949. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources