Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug 11:16:7.
doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-16-7.

A diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for spinal pain part 2: review of the literature

Donald R Murphy  1 , Eric L Hurwitz, Craig F Nelson
Affiliations

A diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for spinal pain part 2: review of the literature

Donald R Murphy et al. Chiropr Osteopat. .

Abstract

Background: Spinal pain is a common and often disabling problem. The research on various treatments for spinal pain has, for the most part, suggested that while several interventions have demonstrated mild to moderate short-term benefit, no single treatment has a major impact on either pain or disability. There is great need for more accurate diagnosis in patients with spinal pain. In a previous paper, the theoretical model of a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule was presented. The approach is designed to provide the clinician with a strategy for arriving at a specific working diagnosis from which treatment decisions can be made. It is based on three questions of diagnosis. In the current paper, the literature on the reliability and validity of the assessment procedures that are included in the diagnosis-based clinical decision rule is presented.

Methods: The databases of Medline, Cinahl, Embase and MANTIS were searched for studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of clinic-based diagnostic procedures for patients with spinal pain that have relevance for questions 2 (which investigates characteristics of the pain source) and 3 (which investigates perpetuating factors of the pain experience). In addition, the reference list of identified papers and authors' libraries were searched.

Results: A total of 1769 articles were retrieved, of which 138 were deemed relevant. Fifty-one studies related to reliability and 76 related to validity. One study evaluated both reliability and validity.

Conclusion: Regarding some aspects of the DBCDR, there are a number of studies that allow the clinician to have a reasonable degree of confidence in his or her findings. This is particularly true for centralization signs, neurodynamic signs and psychological perpetuating factors. There are other aspects of the DBCDR in which a lesser degree of confidence is warranted, and in which further research is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagnostic algorithm for the application of the DBCDR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Management algorithm for the application of the DBCDR.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Borkan J, Van Tulder M, Reis S, Schoene ML, Croft P, Hermoni D. Advances in the field of low back pain in primary care: a report from the Fourth International Forum. Spine. 2002;27:E128–E132. - PubMed
    1. Murphy DR., Hurwitz EL A theoretical model for the development of a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for the management of patients with spinal pain. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2007;8:75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G., Brown K, Deyo R, Haldeman S Acute Low Back Problems in Adults Clinical Practice Guideline Number 14 AHCPR Pub No 95-0642 Rockville, MD Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services. US Department of Health and Human Service. 1994.
    1. Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group. Evidence-Based Managment of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain. Bowen Hills, QLD ; 2003.
    1. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT, Jr., Shekelle P, Owens DK. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Annals of internal medicine. 2007;147:478–491. - PubMed