Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug 11:9:51.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-51.

A review of RCTs in four medical journals to assess the use of imputation to overcome missing data in quality of life outcomes

Shona Fielding  1 , Graeme Maclennan, Jonathan A Cook, Craig R Ramsay
Affiliations

A review of RCTs in four medical journals to assess the use of imputation to overcome missing data in quality of life outcomes

Shona Fielding et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are perceived as the gold-standard method for evaluating healthcare interventions, and increasingly include quality of life (QoL) measures. The observed results are susceptible to bias if a substantial proportion of outcome data are missing. The review aimed to determine whether imputation was used to deal with missing QoL outcomes.

Methods: A random selection of 285 RCTs published during 2005/6 in the British Medical Journal, Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of American Medical Association were identified.

Results: QoL outcomes were reported in 61 (21%) trials. Six (10%) reported having no missing data, 20 (33%) reported </= 10% missing, eleven (18%) 11%-20% missing, and eleven (18%) reported >20% missing. Missingness was unclear in 13 (21%). Missing data were imputed in 19 (31%) of the 61 trials. Imputation was part of the primary analysis in 13 trials, but a sensitivity analysis in six. Last value carried forward was used in 12 trials and multiple imputation in two. Following imputation, the most common analysis method was analysis of covariance (10 trials).

Conclusion: The majority of studies did not impute missing data and carried out a complete-case analysis. For those studies that did impute missing data, researchers tended to prefer simpler methods of imputation, despite more sophisticated methods being available.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ware JR, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. 1993.
    1. Brooks R. with the EuroQoL Group. EuroQoL: The current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53–72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley; 2002.
    1. Donders AR, Heijden GJ van der, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1087–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gadbury GL, Coffey CS, Allison DB. Modern statistical methods for handling missing repeated measurements in obesity trial data: Beyond LOCF. Obes Rev. 2003;4:175–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00109.x. - DOI - PubMed