Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug 11:8:172.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-172.

Developing and testing an instrument to measure the presence of conditions for successful implementation of quality improvement collaboratives

Affiliations

Developing and testing an instrument to measure the presence of conditions for successful implementation of quality improvement collaboratives

Michel L A Dückers et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) teams of practitioners from different health care organizations are brought together to systematically improve an aspect of patient care. Teams take part in a series of meetings to learn about relevant best practices, quality methods and change ideas, and share experiences in making changes in their own local setting. The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument for measuring team organization, external change agent support and support from the team's home institution in a Dutch national improvement and dissemination programme for hospitals based on several QICs.

Methods: The exploratory methodological design included two phases: a) content development and assessment, resulting in an instrument with 15 items, and b) field testing (N = 165). Internal consistency reliability was tested via Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Principal component analyses were used to identify underlying constructs. Tests of scaling assumptions according to the multi trait/multi-item matrix, were used to confirm the component structure.

Results: Three components were revealed, explaining 65% of the variability. The components were labelled 'organizational support', 'team organization' and 'external change agent support'. One item not meeting item-scale criteria was removed. This resulted in a 14 item instrument. Scale reliability ranged from 0.77 to 0.91. Internal item consistency and divergent validity were satisfactory.

Conclusion: On the whole, the instrument appears to be a promising tool for assessing team organization and internal and external support during QIC implementation. The psychometric properties were good and warrant application of the instrument for the evaluation of the national programme and similar improvement programmes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cattell's scree plot; a two dimensional graph with factors on the x-axis and eigenvalues on the y-axis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee S, Choi KS. Assessing the factors influencing continuous quality improvement implementation: experience in Korean hospitals. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2002;14:383–391. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.383. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM. Developing and testing changes in delivery of care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1998;128:651–656. - PubMed
    1. Øvretveit J, Bate P, Cleary P, Cretin S, Gustafson D, McInnes K, McLeod H, Molfenter T, Plsek P, Robert G, Shortell S, Wilson T. Quality collaboratives: lessons from research. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2002;11:345–351. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.345. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landon BE, Wilson IB, McInnes K, Landrum MB, Hirschhorn L, Marsden PV, Gustafson D, Cleary PD. Effects of a quality improvement collaborative on the outcome of care of patients with HIV infection: the EQHIV study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;140:887–896. - PubMed
    1. Mittman BS. Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;140:897–901. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources