Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jul;35(7):3054-61.
doi: 10.1118/1.2938519.

A feasibility study to calculate unshielded fetal doses to pregnant patients in 6-MV photon treatments using Monte Carlo methods and anatomically realistic phantoms

Affiliations

A feasibility study to calculate unshielded fetal doses to pregnant patients in 6-MV photon treatments using Monte Carlo methods and anatomically realistic phantoms

Bryan Bednarz et al. Med Phys. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

A Monte Carlo-based procedure to assess fetal doses from 6-MV external photon beam radiation treatments has been developed to improve upon existing techniques that are based on AAPM Task Group Report 36 published in 1995 [M. Stovall et al., Med. Phys. 22, 63-82 (1995)]. Anatomically realistic models of the pregnant patient representing 3-, 6-, and 9-month gestational stages were implemented into the MCNPX code together with a detailed accelerator model that is capable of simulating scattered and leakage radiation from the accelerator head. Absorbed doses to the fetus were calculated for six different treatment plans for sites above the fetus and one treatment plan for fibrosarcoma in the knee. For treatment plans above the fetus, the fetal doses tended to increase with increasing stage of gestation. This was due to the decrease in distance between the fetal body and field edge with increasing stage of gestation. For the treatment field below the fetus, the absorbed doses tended to decrease with increasing gestational stage of the pregnant patient, due to the increasing size of the fetus and relative constant distance between the field edge and fetal body for each stage. The absorbed doses to the fetus for all treatment plans ranged from a maximum of 30.9 cGy to the 9-month fetus to 1.53 cGy to the 3-month fetus. The study demonstrates the feasibility to accurately determine the absorbed organ doses in the mother and fetus as part of the treatment planning and eventually in risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pregnant patient models plotted in MCNPX: (a) RPI-P3 representing the first trimester of pregnancy, (b) RPI-P6 representing the second trimester of pregnancy, and (c) RPI-P9 representing the third trimester of pregnancy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calculated and measured percent depth dose curves from 4 cm×4 cm, 10 cm×10 cm, and 20 cm×20 cm fields in water.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cross-plane dose profile from 4 cm×4 cm, 10 cm×10 cm, and 20 cm×20 cm fields. Calculated and measured data at 5 cm depth in water. For clarity, the calculated and measured lateral doses for the 10 cm×10 cm and 4 cm×4 cm field sizes were reduced by 20% and 40%, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Out-of-field dose profile in the in-plane direction. Calculated and measured data from 5 cm×5 cm and 10 cm×10 cm fields at 10 cm depth in water.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Plot of a typical treatment setup of the pregnant patient (RPI-P9) and accelerator model in MCNPX. All secondary shielding components are shaded gray.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of calculated fetal dose values from treatment plans for three different gestational stages of the pregnant patient.

References

    1. Stovall M. et al., “Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 36,” Med. Phys. MPHYA610.1118/1.597525 22, 63–82 (1995). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kry S. F., Starkschall G., Antolak J. A., and Salehpour M., “Evaluation of the accuracy of fetal dose estimates using TG-36 data,” Med. Phys. MPHYA610.1118/1.2710332 34, 1193–1197 (2007). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magne N., Marcie S., Pignol J., Casagrande F., and Lagrange J., “Radiotherapy for a solitary brain metastasis during pregnancy: A method for reducing fetal dose,” Br. J. Radiol. 74, 638–641 (2001). - PubMed
    1. Mazonakis M., Damilakis J., Theoharopoulos N., Varberis H., and Gourtsoyiannis N., “Brain radiotherapy during pregnancy: An analysis of conceptus dose using anthropomorphic phantoms,” Br. J. Radiol. 72, 274–278 (1999). - PubMed
    1. Antypas C., Sandilos P., Kouvaris J., Balafouta E., Karinou E., Kollaros N., and Vlahos L., “Fetal dose evaluation during breast cancer radiotherapy,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. IOBPD310.1016/S0360-3016(97)00909-7 40, 995–999 (1998). - DOI - PubMed

Publication types