Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug;54(8):1130-7.

Single risk factor interventions to promote physical activity among patients with chronic diseases: systematic review

Affiliations

Single risk factor interventions to promote physical activity among patients with chronic diseases: systematic review

Catherine Hudon et al. Can Fam Physician. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To provide a summary of evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity among patients affected by at least 1 chronic disease. The interventions studied were each targeted at a single risk factor.

Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched from 1966 to 2006 using 2 sets of search terms. First we searched using physical activity or physical fitness or exercise and health care or primary care or primary health care or family practice or medical office or physician's office and health promotion or health education or counselling. Then we used physical activity or exercise and diabetes or hyperlipidemia or hypertension or obesity or cardiovascular disease or pulmonary disease or risk factor or comorbidity and health promotion or health education or counselling or prescription.

Study selection: We chose randomized controlled trials or trials with a controlled quasi-experimental design that evaluated single risk factor interventions to promote physical activity among adult patients in primary care settings who were affected by at least 1 chronic disease, that reported participation in physical activity as a primary outcome, and that were published in English or French.

Synthesis: Of the 4858 articles found, 62 were assessed, and 3 were selected. Two studies concluded that the interventions evaluated had no effect on level of physical activity. The other reported a positive short-term effect with use of an intensive intervention that was based on the theory of planned behaviour and integrated nurses into the general practitioner counseling process.

Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to assess the effectiveness of single risk factor interventions to promote physical activity among patients affected by at least 1 chronic disease in primary care settings. Of 3 studies, only 1 reported a short-term positive effect.

OBJECTIF: Rassembler les données concernant l’efficacité des interventions visant la promotion de l’activité physique chez des patients souffrant d’au moins une maladie chronique. Chacune des interventions étudiées portait sur un seul facteur de risque.

SOURCES DES DONNÉES: On a consulté MEDLINE, CINAHL et EMBASE entre 1966 et 2006 à l’aide de 2 jeux de mots clés. Une première recherche utilisait les rubriques physical activity ou physical fitness ou exercise et health care ou primary care ou primary health care ou family practice ou medical office ou physician’s office et health promotion ou health education ou counselling. Une deuxième, les rubriques physical activity ou exercise et diabetes ou hyperlipidemia ou hypertension ou obesity ou cardiovascular disease ou pulmonary disease ou risk factor ou comorbidity et health promotion ou health education ou counselling ou prescription.

CHOIX DES ÉTUDES: Nous avons retenu les essais randomisés ou ceux ayant un plan quasi-expérimental avec témoins qui évaluaient des interventions de promotion de l’activité physique chez des adultes souffrant d’au moins une maladie chronique et qui ciblaient un seul facteur de risque dans un contexte de soins primaires, qui avaient comme principale issue la participation à l’activité physique et qui étaient rédigées en anglais ou en français.

SYNTHÈSE: Sur les 4858 articles retracés, 62 ont été évalués et 3 ont été retenus. Deux études concluaient que les interventions étudiées n’avaient aucun effet sur le niveau d’activité physique. L’autre, dans lequel des infirmières cliniciennes participaient à la dispensation de conseils avec l’omnipraticien, rapportait un effet à court terme d’une intervention intensive fondée sur la théorie du comportement planifié.

CONCLUSION: Il n’y a pas suffisamment de données pour évaluer l’efficacité des interventions de promotion de l’activité physique qui ciblent un seul facteur de risque auprès de patients atteints d’au moins 1 maladie chronique, dans un contexte de soins primaires. Sur 3 études, une seule rapportait un effet positif de courte durée.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for action. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2002. [Accessed 2007 Sept 24]. Available from: www.who.int/diabetesactiononline/about/icccglobalreport.pdf.
    1. World Health Organization. Benefits of physical activity. Geneva, Switz: World Health Organization; 2002. [Accessed 2007 Aug 6]. Available from: www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_benefits/en/index.html.
    1. Chakravarthy MV. An obligation for primary care physicians to prescribe physical activity to sedentary patients to reduce the risk of chronic health conditions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(2):165–73. - PubMed
    1. Hu FB, et al. Walking compared with vigorous physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in women: a prospective study. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1433–9. - PubMed
    1. Manson JE, et al. A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(9):650–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms