Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 15;146A(18):2346-54.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32459.

Analysis of the Prader-Willi syndrome chromosome region using quantitative microsphere hybridization (QMH) array

Affiliations

Analysis of the Prader-Willi syndrome chromosome region using quantitative microsphere hybridization (QMH) array

H L Newkirk et al. Am J Med Genet A. .

Abstract

We previously developed a novel quantitative microsphere suspension hybridization (QMH) assay for high-throughput determination of genomic copy number by direct hybridization of unique sequence probes to genomic DNA followed by flow cytometric analysis. Herein, we describe the first clinical application of this assay examining the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) chromosome region at 15q11-13. We designed 30 unique sequence test probes (approximately 60 nucleotides each) spanning 11.37 Mb of chromosome 15q11.2-q13.3 and a disomic reference probe (Actin Beta, chromosome 7p22.1), conjugated to spectrally distinct polystyrene microsphere levels. All probes were hybridized to biotin-labeled genomic DNA in multiplex QMH reactions, and hybridization was detected using phycoerythrin-labeled streptavidin and analyzed by dual-laser flow cytometry. Copy number differences were distinguished by comparing mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of the test probes to the reference probe in 20 individuals with PWS and six controls. The mean MFI ratio for deleted loci was 0.56 +/- 0.09 (n = 88) as compared to the MFI ratios for normal loci, 0.96 +/- 0.06 (n = 236), and duplicated loci, 1.44 +/- 0.10 (n = 22). A multiplex QMH assay could readily distinguish type I from type II deletions in PWS subjects, as well as small (approximately 4.3 kb) imprinting center (IC) deletions, with no overlap in MFI values compared with normal loci. Using this diagnostic QMH assay, the precise deleted genomic interval could be ascertained in all PWS subjects examined in the present study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of PWS/AS region on chromosome 15q11–13. The chromosomal coordinates for QMH probes conjugated to microspheres are indicated to the left. The type I and type II deletion intervals as well as their breakpoint intervals (BP) are depicted, as well as the IC region. The locations of the various single copy probes used in the present study are indicated by the symbols as defined in the legend.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary statistics for the PWS QMH assay. The MFI ratios for all tested loci are plotted to illustrate that MFI ratios for various genotypes do not overlap. The mean MFI ratio for deleted loci (pink) was 0.56 ± 0.09 (n = 88) as compared to the MFI ratios for normal loci (blue), 0.96 ± 0.06 (n = 236), and duplicated loci (yellow), 1.44 ± 0.1 (n = 22).

References

    1. Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. A cytogeneticist’s perspective on genomic microarrays. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:221–226. - PubMed
    1. Bettio D, Rizzi N, Giardino D, Grugni G, Briscioli V, Selicorni A, Carnevale F, Larizza L. FISH analysis in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndrome patients. Am J Med Genet. 1995;56:224–228. - PubMed
    1. Bittel DC, Butler MG. Prader-Willi syndrome: Clinical genetics, cytogenetics and molecular biology. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2005;7:1–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bittel DC, Kibiryeva N, Talebizadeh Z, Butler MG. Microarray analysis of gene/transcript expression in Prader-Willi syndrome: Deletion versus UPD. J Med Genet. 2003;40:568–574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bittel DC, Kibiryeva N, Talebizadeh Z, Driscoll DJ, Butler MG. Microarray analysis of gene/transcript expression in Angelman syndrome: Deletion versus UPD. Genomics. 2005;85:85–91. - PMC - PubMed