Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 May;36(4):312-5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01765.x.

Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Does peak intraocular pressure measured by water drinking test reflect peak circadian levels? A pilot study

Rajesh S Kumar et al. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 May.

Abstract

Background: To determine whether there is a correlation between peak intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after water drinking test (WDT) and patient's peak daytime IOP.

Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension and/or glaucoma-like discs were enrolled in this prospective observational pilot study. All subjects underwent daytime IOP measurement by a single observer using a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer at 3-h intervals. Subjects were then given 10 mL/kg body weight of water to drink over 5 min; IOP was measured every 15 min for an hour. Correlations between peak IOP and IOP fluctuations as measured by the two methods were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: Twenty-five patients were recruited for the study. There were 16 males and 9 females. The mean age was 68.8 +/- 8.7 years (50-82 years), and 48% had primary open angle glaucoma. The mean peak IOP measured by diurnal testing (15.52 +/- 3.6 mm Hg) was not statistically different from that measured by WDT (15.92 +/- 3.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.7). The mean fluctuation in IOP measured during the day (2.32 +/- 1.3 mm Hg) was also not significantly different from that measured by WDT (2.24 +/- 1.2 mm Hg) (P = 0.8). Though peak IOP measured during diurnal testing showed strong correlation with peak IOP during WDT (r = 0.876), IOP fluctuation measured by the two tests showed poor correlation (r = -0.0789).

Conclusion: WDT may provide a satisfactory alternative measure of peak IOP in a clinic setting. A larger sample is required to assess whether it is a good measure of IOP fluctuation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types