Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct;90(7):565-70.
doi: 10.1308/003588408X301055. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

Prospective evaluation of a novel one-stop testicular clinic

Affiliations

Prospective evaluation of a novel one-stop testicular clinic

Mark Rochester et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: In 2003, the waiting time for routine scrotal assessment approached 6 months in our hospital. The patients' diagnostic pathway was not uniform and involved several delays between general practitioner, radiologist and urologist. If malignancy was suspected, patients were seen and assessed within 2 weeks. However, it was possible for patients with unsuspected malignancy to have their diagnosis delayed.

Patients and methods: Funding was provided by the NHS Modernisation Agency's Action On Urology project. Men who were referred by their general practitioner (GP) with a testicular or scrotal condition would be reviewed in a one-stop joint sonographer and urology nurse specialist clinic provided entirely within the urology department with rapid open access. Data were prospectively collected for 2 years. Source of referral, suspected diagnosis, findings and outcome were recorded.

Results: A total of 1017 patients attended the clinic over this period; of these, 203 (4%) were referred under the '2-week wait' criteria. Of patients attending the clinic, 79% were discharged to GP care, 8% were added to the waiting list for a surgical procedure and 20% were referred with 'testicular lump'. Eleven patients were suspected to have testicular tumour on ultrasound and proceeded to orchidectomy in this period. One patient (0.1%) was found to have an unsuspected seminoma. The waiting time for all scrotal ultrasound examinations has fallen from 22 to 2 weeks. The waiting times for intravenous urography and general ultrasound were also significantly reduced following the introduction of this service (P = 0.005).

Conclusions: The majority of patients passing through this clinic are the 'worried-well' with benign scrotal pathology. They can now be seen within 2 weeks regardless of whether their GP suspects testicular tumour. This reduces anxiety in this large group of patients freeing capacity elsewhere in the diagnostic imaging department.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GP referrals to one-stop service per month.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Final outcome of cohort of 1017 patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Outcome destination in the indirect supervision period.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Waiting times for radiological investigations. Mean (SD) monthly wait for (A) IVU, (B) general ultrasound, and (C) CT scan displayed per 3-month (quarter) period.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Waiting times for radiological investigations. Mean (SD) monthly wait for (A) IVU, (B) general ultrasound, and (C) CT scan displayed per 3-month (quarter) period.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Waiting times for radiological investigations. Mean (SD) monthly wait for (A) IVU, (B) general ultrasound, and (C) CT scan displayed per 3-month (quarter) period.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guthrie JA, Fowler RC. Ultrasound diagnosis of testicular tumours presenting as epididymal disease. Clin Radiol. 1992;46:397–400. - PubMed
    1. Older RA, Omary RA, Watson LR. The impact of sonography on the diagnosis of scrotal disorders. J Urol. 1997;158:479–80. - PubMed
    1. Adeyoju AB, Collins GN, Pollard AJ, Liaw J, Brooman PJ, O'Reilly PH. A prospective evaluation of scrotal ultrasonography in clinical practice. BJU Int. 2000;86:87–8. - PubMed
    1. Foster PW, Ritchie AW, Jones DJ. Prospective analysis of scrotal pathology referrals – are referrals appropriate and accurate? Ann RColl Surg Engl. 2006;88:363–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Debnath D, Dielehner N, Gunning KA. Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer. Postgrad Med J. 2002;78:748–51. - PMC - PubMed