Tent photoscreening and patched HOTV visual acuity by school nurses: validation of the ASD-ABCD protocol. (Anchorage School District- Alaska Blind Child Discovery program)
- PMID: 18702611
Tent photoscreening and patched HOTV visual acuity by school nurses: validation of the ASD-ABCD protocol. (Anchorage School District- Alaska Blind Child Discovery program)
Abstract
Background: Novel objective tests of risk factors for amblyopia offer an alternative for preschool vision screening. We compared the merits of photoscreening versus portable patched acuity testing in elementary schools. Photoscreening may outperform routine acuity testing in pediatric offices; however, both have fairly good validity when performed by specialists in preschool vision screening.
Methods: School nurses performed patched HOTV surround acuity testing and two types of photoscreening (MTI and Gateway DV-S20) in a portable tent near each classroom.
Results: 1700 children (696 1st grade, 710 Kindergarteners and 271 special-needs pre-Kindergarten). 14% had comprehensive exams and another 65% had normal photoscreens combined with patched acuities of 20/20 or better OU. We estimate the overall sensitivity/specificity using AAPOS guidelines for the modalities to be 39%:99% for patched HOTV acuity, 77%:99% for MTI photoscreening, and 85%:98% for Gateway photoscreening. The specificity of acuity testing was particularly low in pre-K due to 33% unable to complete the test, but about 80% of initial acuity failures were able to pass with pinhole.
Conclusion: Tent photoscreening in younger elementary school children was more sensitive and faster than patched acuity particularly in developmentally delayed pre-K children.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of patched HOTV visual acuity and photoscreening.J Sch Nurs. 2006 Aug;22(4):237-43. doi: 10.1177/10598405050220040901. J Sch Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16856779
-
Validated portable pediatric vision screening in the Alaska Bush. A VIPS-like study in the Koyukon.Alaska Med. 2007 Jan-Mar;49(1):2-15. Alaska Med. 2007. PMID: 17479731
-
Pediatric eye/vision screening. Referral criteria for the pedia vision plus optix s 04 photoscreener compared to visual acuity and digital photoscreening. Kindergarten computer photoscreening.Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2007;22(2):83-9. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2007. PMID: 17688416
-
Plusoptix photoscreener use for paediatric vision screening in Flanders and Iran.Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;98(1):80-88. doi: 10.1111/aos.14144. Epub 2019 Jun 14. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31197950 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening for pediatric eye disease.Am Fam Physician. 1992 Oct;46(4):1243-52. Am Fam Physician. 1992. PMID: 1472256 Review.
Cited by
-
Drive-by Photoscreening: Plusoptix, 2WIN and Blinq Amblyopia Detection During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 23;15:775-782. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S300871. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33654376 Free PMC article.
-
Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter].Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 9;15:1463-1464. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S313977. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33859471 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Vision screening using a smartphone platform.Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022 May 6;40:e2020021. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020021IN. eCollection 2022. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35544901 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric Eye Evaluations Preferred Practice Pattern.Ophthalmology. 2023 Mar;130(3):P222-P270. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.030. Epub 2022 Dec 19. Ophthalmology. 2023. PMID: 36543602 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases.Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 May 25;14:1427-1435. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S251451. eCollection 2020. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32546951 Free PMC article.