Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina
- PMID: 18702967
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.024
Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive visual (computed tomography coronary angiography [CTCA]) and quantitative computed tomography coronary angiography (QCT) to predict the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis, using intracoronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.
Background: It has been demonstrated that CTCA provides excellent diagnostic sensitivity for identifying coronary stenoses, but may lack accurate delineation of the hemodynamic significance.
Methods: We investigated 79 patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent both 64-slice or dual-source CTCA and FFR measurement of discrete coronary stenoses. CTCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA), and QCT and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), were performed to determine the severity of a stenosis that was compared with FFR measurements. A significant anatomical or functional stenosis was defined as >/=50% diameter stenosis or an FFR <0.75. Stented segments and bypass grafts were not included in the analysis.
Results: A total of 89 stenoses were evaluated of which 18% (16 of 89) had an FFR <0.75. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA, QCT, CCA, and QCA to detect a hemodynamically significant coronary lesion was 49%, 71%, 61%, and 67%, respectively. Correlation between QCT and QCA with FFR measurement was weak (R values of -0.32 and -0.30, respectively). Correlation between QCT and QCA was significant, but only moderate (R = 0.53; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The anatomical assessment of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses determined by visual CTCA, CCA, or QCT or QCA does not correlate well with the functional assessment of FFR. Determining the hemodynamic significance of an angiographically intermediate stenosis remains relevant before referral for revascularization treatment.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Dec;31(8):1651-61. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0748-1. Epub 2015 Sep 1. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26323355
-
Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):43-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000277. Epub 2013 Nov 26. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24280729
-
CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May;9(5):559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.021. Epub 2016 Feb 17. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26897669
-
Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.Am J Cardiol. 2015 Nov 1;116(9):1469-78. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.078. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Am J Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26347004 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interpreting results of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in clinical practice.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep-Oct;11(5):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 23. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017. PMID: 28666784 Review.
Cited by
-
Coronary artery disease in atrial fibrillation ablation: impact on arrhythmic outcomes.Europace. 2023 Dec 6;25(12):euad328. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad328. Europace. 2023. PMID: 38064697 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic value of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary computed tomography angiography-derived ischaemia algorithm for patients with suspected coronary artery disease.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Apr 30;25(5):657-667. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead339. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38084894 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning-based detection of functionally significant stenosis in coronary CT angiography.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 15;9:964355. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.964355. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36457806 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;31 Suppl 1:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0645-7. Epub 2015 Mar 26. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25809387 Review.
-
Dose Reduction of Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Tube Voltage Change: Investigation in a Swine Model.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 3;9:823974. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.823974. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35310988 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical