Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England
- PMID: 18703659
- PMCID: PMC2515887
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a957
Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England
Abstract
Objective: To assess the receipt of effective healthcare interventions in England by adults aged 50 or more with serious health conditions.
Design: National structured survey questionnaire with face to face interviews covering medical panel endorsed quality of care indicators for both publicly and privately provided care.
Setting: Private households across England.
Participants: 8688 participants in the English longitudinal study of ageing, of whom 4417 reported diagnoses of one or more of 13 conditions.
Main outcome measures: Percentage of indicated interventions received by eligible participants for 32 clinical indicators and seven questions on patient centred care, and aggregate scores.
Results: Participants were eligible for 19 082 items of indicated care. Receipt of indicated care varied substantially by condition. The percentage of indicated care received by eligible participants was highest for ischaemic heart disease (83%, 95% confidence interval 80% to 86%), followed by hearing problems (79%, 77% to 81%), pain management (78%, 73% to 83%), diabetes (74%, 72% to 76%), smoking cessation (74%, 71% to 76%), hypertension (72%, 69% to 76%), stroke (65%, 54% to 76%), depression (64%, 57% to 70%), patient centred care (58%, 57% to 60%), poor vision (58%, 54% to 63%), osteoporosis (53%, 49% to 57%), urinary incontinence (51%, 47% to 54%), falls management (44%, 37% to 51%), osteoarthritis (29%, 26% to 32%), and overall (62%, 62% to 63%). Substantially more indicated care was received for general medical (74%, 73% to 76%) than for geriatric conditions (57%, 55% to 58%), and for conditions included in the general practice pay for performance contract (75%, 73% to 76%) than excluded from it (58%, 56% to 59%).
Conclusions: Shortfalls in receipt of basic recommended care by adults aged 50 or more with common health conditions in England were most noticeable in areas associated with disability and frailty, but few areas were exempt. Efforts to improve care have substantial scope to achieve better health outcomes and particularly need to include chronic conditions that affect quality of life of older people.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Measuring the quality of healthcare systems using composites.BMJ. 2008 Aug 13;337:a639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a639. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18703658 No abstract available.
References
-
- Bunker JP. The role of medical care in contributing to health improvements within societies. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:1260-3. - PubMed
-
- Leatherman S, Sutherland K. The quest for quality in the NHS: a chartbook on quality of care in the UK. Oxford: Radcliffe, 2005.
-
- Wenger NS, Solomon DH, Roth CP, MacLean CH, Saliba D, Kamberg CJ, et al. The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:740-7. - PubMed
-
- Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2001;39(suppl 2):S46-54. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical