Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Oct 15;178(8):798-804.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.200711-1617OC. Epub 2008 Aug 14.

Duration of withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit and association with family satisfaction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Duration of withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit and association with family satisfaction

Eric Gerstel et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Rationale: Most deaths in the intensive care unit (ICU) involve withholding or withdrawing multiple life-sustaining therapies, but little is known about how to proceed practically and how this process affects family satisfaction.

Objectives: To examine the duration of life-support withdrawal and its association with overall family satisfaction with care in the ICU.

Methods: We studied family members of 584 patients who died in an ICU at 1 of 14 hospitals after withdrawal of life support and for whom complete medical chart and family questionnaires were available.

Measurements and main results: Data concerning six life-sustaining interventions administered during the last 5 days of life were collected. Families were asked to rate their satisfaction with care using the Family Satisfaction in the ICU questionnaire. For nearly half of the patients (271/584), withdrawal of all life-sustaining interventions took more than 1 day. Patients with a prolonged (>1 d) life-support withdrawal were younger, stayed longer in the ICU, had more life-sustaining interventions, had less often a diagnosis of cancer, and had more decision makers involved. Among patients with longer ICU stays, a longer duration in life-support withdrawal was associated with an increase in family satisfaction with care (P = 0.037). Extubation before death was associated with higher family satisfaction with care (P = 0.009).

Conclusions: Withdrawal of life support is a complex process that depends on patient and family characteristics. Stuttering withdrawal is a frequent phenomenon that seems to be associated with family satisfaction. Extubation before death should be encouraged if possible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>Figure 1.</b>
Figure 1.
Time sequence of life-sustaining therapies/interventions withdrawal. Mean and 95% confidence intervals of the mean of duration between therapy/intervention interruption and death or transfer (confidence intervals obtained by bootstrap analysis). RRT = renal replacement therapy.

References

    1. The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995;274:1591–1598. - PubMed
    1. National Health Center for Statistics. Deaths by place of death, age, race, and sex: United States [Internet] [accessed September 8, 2008]. Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/data/dvs/MortFinal2004_Worktable309.pdf
    1. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, Rubenfeld GD; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICU End-Of-Life Peer Group. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med 2004;32:638–643. - PubMed
    1. Fein EB. Talking around death: chronicling the end for 20: hard choices are harder when wishes go unsaid. New York Times March 5, 1997; B5.
    1. Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD. Introducing the concept of managing death in the ICU. In: Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD, editors. Managing death in the intensive care unit: the transition from cure to comfort. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 3.

Publication types