Duration of withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit and association with family satisfaction
- PMID: 18703787
- PMCID: PMC2566791
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200711-1617OC
Duration of withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit and association with family satisfaction
Abstract
Rationale: Most deaths in the intensive care unit (ICU) involve withholding or withdrawing multiple life-sustaining therapies, but little is known about how to proceed practically and how this process affects family satisfaction.
Objectives: To examine the duration of life-support withdrawal and its association with overall family satisfaction with care in the ICU.
Methods: We studied family members of 584 patients who died in an ICU at 1 of 14 hospitals after withdrawal of life support and for whom complete medical chart and family questionnaires were available.
Measurements and main results: Data concerning six life-sustaining interventions administered during the last 5 days of life were collected. Families were asked to rate their satisfaction with care using the Family Satisfaction in the ICU questionnaire. For nearly half of the patients (271/584), withdrawal of all life-sustaining interventions took more than 1 day. Patients with a prolonged (>1 d) life-support withdrawal were younger, stayed longer in the ICU, had more life-sustaining interventions, had less often a diagnosis of cancer, and had more decision makers involved. Among patients with longer ICU stays, a longer duration in life-support withdrawal was associated with an increase in family satisfaction with care (P = 0.037). Extubation before death was associated with higher family satisfaction with care (P = 0.009).
Conclusions: Withdrawal of life support is a complex process that depends on patient and family characteristics. Stuttering withdrawal is a frequent phenomenon that seems to be associated with family satisfaction. Extubation before death should be encouraged if possible.
Figures
References
-
- The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995;274:1591–1598. - PubMed
-
- National Health Center for Statistics. Deaths by place of death, age, race, and sex: United States [Internet] [accessed September 8, 2008]. Available from: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/data/dvs/MortFinal2004_Worktable309.pdf
-
- Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, Rubenfeld GD; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICU End-Of-Life Peer Group. Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: an epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med 2004;32:638–643. - PubMed
-
- Fein EB. Talking around death: chronicling the end for 20: hard choices are harder when wishes go unsaid. New York Times March 5, 1997; B5.
-
- Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD. Introducing the concept of managing death in the ICU. In: Curtis JR, Rubenfeld GD, editors. Managing death in the intensive care unit: the transition from cure to comfort. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical