Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Oct;12(10):1691-7; discussion 1697-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0636-2. Epub 2008 Aug 13.

Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates

Cristina R Ferrone et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic fistula is a major source of morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (DP). We reviewed 462 consecutive patients undergoing DP to determine if the method of stump closure impacted fistula rates.

Methods: A retrospective review of clinicopathologic variables of patients who underwent DP between February 1994 and February 2008 was performed. The International Study Group classification for pancreatic fistula was utilized (Bassi et al., Surgery, 138(1):8-13, 2005).

Results: The overall pancreatic fistula rate was 29% (133/462). DP with splenectomy was performed in 321 (69%) patients. Additional organs were resected in 116 (25%) patients. The pancreatic stump was closed with a fish-mouth suture closure in 227, of whom 67 (30%) developed a fistula. Pancreatic duct ligation did not decrease the fistula rate (29% vs. 30%). A free falciform patch was used in 108 patients, with a fistula rate of 28% (30/108). Stapled compared to stapled with staple line reinforcement had a fistula rate of 24% (10/41) vs. 33% (15/45). There is no significant difference in the rate of fistula formation between the different stump closures (p = 0.73). On multivariate analysis, BMI > 30 kg/m(2), male gender, and an additional procedure were significant predictors of pancreatic fistula.

Conclusions: The pancreatic fistula rate was 29%. Staplers with or without staple line reinforcement do not significantly reduce fistula rates after DP. Reduction of pancreatic fistulas after DP remains an unsolved challenge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of distal pancreatectomies performed by year over time.

References

    1. Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(3):356–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(11):922–925. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02821.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez JR, Germes SS, Pandharipande PV, et al. Implications and cost of pancreatic leak following distal pancreatic resection. Arch Surg. 2006;141(4):361–365. doi:10.1001/archsurg.141.4.361(Discussion 6) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg. 1999;229(5):693–698. doi:10.1097/00000658-199905000-00012(Discussion 8–700) - PMC - PubMed

Publication types