Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jul;9(4):545-60.
doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00468.x.

Post-translational modification of host proteins in pathogen-triggered defence signalling in plants

Affiliations
Review

Post-translational modification of host proteins in pathogen-triggered defence signalling in plants

Iris J E Stulemeijer et al. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Microbial plant pathogens impose a continuous threat to global food production. Similar to animals, an innate immune system allows plants to recognize pathogens and swiftly activate defence. To activate a rapid response, receptor-mediated pathogen perception and subsequent downstream signalling depends on post-translational modification (PTM) of components essential for defence signalling. We discuss different types of PTMs that play a role in mounting plant immunity, which include phosphorylation, glycosylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, nitrosylation, myristoylation, palmitoylation and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchoring. PTMs are rapid, reversible, controlled and highly specific, and provide a tool to regulate protein stability, activity and localization. Here, we give an overview of PTMs that modify components essential for defence signalling at the site of signal perception, during secondary messenger production and during signalling in the cytoplasm. In addition, we discuss effectors from pathogens that suppress plant defence responses by interfering with host PTMs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Defence‐related signal transduction cascades that depend on post‐translational modifications. Receptors mediate recognition of microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and race‐specific elicitors (elicitor), but they require additional proteins for their function. Proteins with nucleotide‐binding and leucine‐rich repeat domains (NB‐LRR) recognize their cognate elicitors intracellularly, while receptor‐like proteins (RLP) and receptor‐like kinases (RLK) are probably activated outside the cell. RLPs require additional proteins that bind the cytoplasmically localized part of the protein to mediate downstream signalling, while RLKs require their kinase domain to autophosphorylate and form complexes with additional proteins. RLKs might become ubiquitinated, after which they are internalized and targeted for proteasome‐mediated degradation. Signalling downstream from the receptor eventually leads to the formation of secondary messengers such as phosphatidic acid (PA), possibly via phospholipase C (PLC) phosphorylation, and nitric oxide (NO). The concentrations of ions such as H+, K+ and Ca2+ are controlled by (de)phosphorylation of the respective ATPase while the production of ROS is stimulated upon phosphorylation of the NADPH oxidases (RBOH). The secondary messengers also mediate phosphorylation of proteins such as calcium‐dependent protein kinases (CDPK), or syntaxins, which might promote the release of pathogenesis‐related (PR) proteins into the apoplast. Mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades are activated by phosphorylation of the individual components, which eventually leads to the phosphorylation of, amongst others WRKY transcription factors, 1‐aminocyclopropane‐1‐carboxylic acid synthase (ACS) and MAP kinase substrate 1 (MKS1), which influence the production of ethylene (Et) and salicylic acid (SA), respectively. Also, E3‐ligases are activated, which might result in the ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of negative regulators of the signalling cascades, thereby providing a positive feedback loop. In addition, negative feedback loops are required to prevent an uncontrolled hypersensitive response (HR). For example, MAPK (MPK)‐mediated ethylene production negatively regulates MAPK activation. The secondary messengers influence each other and fine‐tune the downstream signal while proteins modified by secondary messengers might inhibit receptor‐mediated signals. Eventually, a balanced signal will lead to increased (basal) resistance and possibly a HR. Phosphorylation states as presented in this figure represent the active state of the protein. Protein names indicated in grey might be specific for a particular plant–pathogen interaction. ACIK1, Avr9/Cf‐9‐induced kinase 1; CITRX, Cf‐9‐interacting thioredoxin; RIN4, RPM1‐interacting protein 4; BAK1, BRASSINOSTEROID‐INSENSITIVE 1; XB3, Xa21‐binding protein 3; Adi3, AvrPto‐dependent Pto‐interacting protein 3; PDK1, 3‐phosphoinositide‐dependent protein kinase‐1; AGC‐kinase, protein kinase A, G and C family; OXI1, oxidative signal‐inducible 1.

References

    1. Abramovitch, R.B. , Anderson, J.C. and Martin, G.B. (2006a) Bacterial elicitation and evasion of plant innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 601–611. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abramovitch, R.B. , Janjusevic, R. , Stebbins, C.E. and Martin, G.B. (2006b) Type III effector AvrPtoB requires intrinsic E3 ubiquitin ligase activity to suppress plant cell death and immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 2851–2856. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ade, J. , DeYoung, B.J. , Golstein, C. and Innes, R.W. (2007) Indirect activation of a plant nucleotide binding site‐leucine‐rich repeat protein by a bacterial protease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 2531–2536. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alfano, J.R. and Collmer, A. (2004) Type III secretion system effector proteins: double agents in bacterial disease and plant defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 42, 385–414. - PubMed
    1. Andersson, M.X. , Kourtchenko, O. , Dangl, J.L. , Mackey, D. and Ellerström, M. (2006) Phospholipase‐dependent signalling during the AvrRpm1‐ and AvrRpt2‐induced disease resistance responses in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant J. 47, 947–959. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources