Disparities in the receipt of fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy among Filipino American immigrants
- PMID: 18708385
- PMCID: PMC2852182
- DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2800
Disparities in the receipt of fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy among Filipino American immigrants
Abstract
Background: This report examines disparities associated with the type of colorectal screening test, fecal occult blood test versus endoscopy, within a particular racial/ethnic group, Filipino American immigrants.
Methods: Between July 2005 and October 2006, Filipino Americans aged 50 to 75 years from 31 community organizations in Los Angeles completed a 15-minute survey in English (65%) or Filipino (35%).
Results: Of the 487 respondents included in this analysis, 257 (53%) had never received any type of colorectal cancer screening. Among the 230 subjects who had ever received a routine screening test, 78 had fecal occult blood test only (16% of the total sample), and 152 had endoscopy with or without fecal occult blood test (31% of the total sample). After controlling for access to care and key demographic variables in a multivariate analysis, only two characteristics distinguished between respondents who had fecal occult blood test only versus those who had endoscopy: acculturation, assessed by percent lifetime in the United States and language of interview, and income.
Conclusions: Our data suggest a two-tier system, fecal occult blood test for less acculturated Filipino Americans with lower income versus endoscopy for Filipino immigrants with higher levels of acculturation and income. The disparity persists after adjusting for access to care. Instead of treating minority groups as monolithic, differences within groups need to be examined so that interventions can be appropriately targeted.
Similar articles
-
Demographic predictors of cancer screening among Filipino and Korean immigrants in the United States.Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00110-5. Am J Prev Med. 2000. PMID: 10808984
-
Dissemination of colorectal cancer screening by Filipino American community health advisors: a feasibility study.Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jul;14(4):498-505. doi: 10.1177/1524839912458108. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Health Promot Pract. 2013. PMID: 22982706
-
Use of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and fecal occult blood test in the 2007 Swiss Health Interview Survey respondents aged 50 years and older.Endoscopy. 2013 Jul;45(7):560-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326636. Epub 2013 Jun 18. Endoscopy. 2013. PMID: 23780844
-
The colonial context of Filipino American immigrants' psychological experiences.Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2013 Jul;19(3):298-309. doi: 10.1037/a0032903. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23875854
-
Peer Support as an Ideal Solution for Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jun;63(6):850-858. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001611. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020. PMID: 32167969
Cited by
-
Disparities in endoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening in the United States.Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Mar;59(3):530-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2937-x. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Dig Dis Sci. 2014. PMID: 24248417 Review.
-
Implementation of an evidence-based intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening in community organizations: a cluster randomized trial.Transl Behav Med. 2016 Jun;6(2):295-305. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0349-5. Transl Behav Med. 2016. PMID: 27282431 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Determining Filipinos' Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: Insights From a Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.AJPM Focus. 2024 Nov 22;4(1):100300. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100300. eCollection 2025 Feb. AJPM Focus. 2024. PMID: 39810972 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in colorectal cancer screening utilization among ethnic groups in California: are we closing the gap?Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):752-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0608. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009. PMID: 19273482 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 15. Patient Educ Couns. 2013. PMID: 23419327 Free PMC article.
References
-
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 3rd. Alexandria (VA): International Medical Publishing; 2002.
-
- Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):389–94. - PubMed
-
- Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB. Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: Another approach to following the guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(1):108–13. - PubMed
-
- Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical