Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Oct 1;198(7):1019-27.
doi: 10.1086/591629.

Initial and subsequent response to pneumococcal polysaccharide and protein-conjugate vaccines administered sequentially to adults who have recovered from pneumococcal pneumonia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Initial and subsequent response to pneumococcal polysaccharide and protein-conjugate vaccines administered sequentially to adults who have recovered from pneumococcal pneumonia

Daniel M Musher et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Controversy persists over the benefits of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) for adults at high risk for pneumococcal disease. We studied PPV, protein-conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (PCV), and immunologic "priming" with PCV followed by "boosting" with PPV in adults who had recovered from pneumococcal pneumonia.

Methods: Subjects received PPV followed by PCV 6 months later, or vice versa. The levels of IgG to capsular polysaccharide and opsonophagocytic killing activity (OPK) were studied at baseline and at 4-8 weeks and 6 months after each vaccination.

Results: PPV and PCV stimulated similar IgG levels and OPK at 4-8 weeks after vaccination. Six months after receipt of PPV, the antibody levels declined to baseline but remained modestly elevated after receipt of PCV. PCV administered 6 months after PPV stimulated modest increases in IgG level that failed to reach the peaks observed after receipt of PPV. In contrast, PPV administered 6 months after PCV caused dramatic increases in the levels of IgG and OPK for all polysaccharides at 4-8 weeks, consistent with a booster effect. Six months after receipt of the second vaccination, however, levels of IgG and OPK fell precipitously in all patients, approaching baseline levels.

Conclusions: In these high-risk subjects who have recovered after treatment for pneumonia, the effect of PPV is short-lived; PCV stimulates a more prolonged response. The use of PPV as a booster following PCV causes early increases in antibody levels, but the level of IgG declines rapidly thereafter, consistent with induction of suppressor cells or tolerance. Protein vaccines may be needed for high-risk adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

- Daniel M. Musher: From 1997 through 2002 Dr. Musher’s laboratory received funding from Merck for participating in an investigator-designed, multicenter study of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.

- Adriana M. Rueda: No conflict

- Moon H. Nahm: No conflict

- Edward A. Graviss: No conflict

- Maria C. Rodriguez-Barradas: No conflict

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IgG to capsular polysaccharides (in µg/ml) is shown for Group 1 (patients who received PPV followed, 6 months later, by PCV, dashed lines) and Group 2 (patients who received PCV followed, 6 months later, by PPV, solid lines). Each panel shows results for a different CPS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Opsonic activity reported as OPK index for four CPS at each point of the study. Group 1 (PPV followed by PCV) is shown by dashed lines and Group 2 (PCV followed by PPV) by solid lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IgG after patients received PPV followed by PCV (Panel A) or vice-versa (Panel B), with patients stratified according to prior vaccination status. Dotted line: those who received pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine within the previous year; dashed line: those vaccinated 1 – 5 years previously; and solid line: those vaccinated > 5 years previously or never vaccinated. Representative data are shown for CPS 6B; similar responses were observed with the other 3 CPS studied. None of the patients in Group 1, who received PPV in the previous year (Panel A) had a 6 month follow-up serum. Small numbers of subjects in some groups precluded statistical analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Broome CV, Facklam RR, Fraser DW. Pneumococcal disease after pneumococcal vaccination: an alternative method to estimate the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccine. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:549–552. - PubMed
    1. Shapiro ED, Berg AT, Austrian R, et al. The protective efficacy of polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1453–1460. - PubMed
    1. Jackson LA, Neuzil KM, Yu O, et al. Effectiveness of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1747–1755. - PubMed
    1. Musher DM, Rueda-Jaimes AM, Graviss EA, Rodriguez-Barradas MC. Effect of pneumococcal vaccination: a comparison of vaccination rates in patients with bacteremic and nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1004–1008. - PubMed
    1. Fedson DS, Musher DM. Pneumococcal vaccine. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WB, editors. Vaccines. Fourth ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2003. pp. 529–588.

Publication types

Substances