Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Sep;34(9):1101-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.004.

Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography

B Guniz Baksi et al. J Endod. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare film and digital radiography in assessing the radiopacities of root canal sealers and to establish the relation in aluminum equivalent values of different methods. Standard disks of 5 different sealers were exposed together with an aluminum step wedge by using occlusal films and storage phosphor plates. Optical density of the sealers was evaluated by transmission densitometry, and mean gray values were determined by digital analysis. The data were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance (P = .05). Pairwise comparisons were made by using Tukey post hoc and paired t tests (P = .05). The order from the most radiopaque to the most radiolucent sealer was the same for both methods; however, aluminum equivalent values determined by transmission densitometry were significantly higher (P < .01). Aluminum equivalent values of the 2 radiographic methods were 7%-20% different. The International Standards Organization standard for the radiopacity of dental root canal sealing materials needs modifications for digital systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources