Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;30(1):40-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Jul 31.

Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness

Louise Howard  1 , Isabel de Salis, Zelda Tomlin, Graham Thornicroft, Jenny Donovan
Affiliations

Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness

Louise Howard et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Under-recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often problematic and there may be particular difficulties in recruiting patients with severe mental illness.

Aim: To evaluate reasons for under-recruitment in an RCT of patients with severe mental illness

Methods: Qualitative study during the recruitment phase of an RCT of supported employment. Trial staff and recruiting clinicians were interviewed. Data were analyzed thematically using constant comparative techniques.

Results: Recruitment rates were low. Five main reasons for recruitment difficulties were found. These included: (i) misconceptions about trials, (ii) lack of equipoise, (iii) misunderstanding of the trial arms, (iv) variable interpretations of eligibility criteria, (v) paternalism.

Conclusion: Reasons for recruitment difficulties in trials involving patients with severe mental illness include issues that occur in trials in general, but others are more specific to these patients. Clinician and patient involvement in the study design may improve recruitment in future similar trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hunninghake D.B., Darby C.A., Probstfield J.L. Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials. Dec 1987;8(4 Suppl):6S–30S. - PubMed
    1. Lovato L.C., Hill K., Hertert S., Hunninghake D.B., Probstfield J.L. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials. Aug 1997;18(4):328–352. - PubMed
    1. Ross S., Grant A., Counsell C., Gillespie W., Russell I., Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. Dec 1999;52(12):1143–1156. - PubMed
    1. Mapstone J., Elbourne D., Roberts I. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database Methodol Rev. 2002;(3)
    1. McDaid C., Hodges Z., Fayter D., Stirk L., Eastwood A. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2006. Systematic review of interventions to increase participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials. Report No.: 32.

Publication types