Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Feb;135(2):217-26.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-008-0454-7. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

Randomised trial comparing biweekly oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine versus oxaliplatin plus i.v. bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology study 0401

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised trial comparing biweekly oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine versus oxaliplatin plus i.v. bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology study 0401

Pasquale Comella et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Oxaliplatin combined with either fluorouracil/leucovorin (OXAFAFU) or capecitabine (OXXEL) has a demonstrated activity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We aimed at comparing these two regimens in terms of response rate (RR), safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QoL) of patients.

Methods: A total of 322 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive biweekly: oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily from day 1 to day 11 (OXXEL); or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1; 6S-leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) i.v. and fluorouracil 850 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 2 (OXAFAFU).

Results: Eleven complete and 42 partial responses were registered with OXXEL (RR = 34%); six complete and 48 partial responses were obtained with OXAFAFU (RR = 33%) (P = 0.999). Severe adverse events were less frequent (32 vs. 43%) with OXXEL, which also reduced the occurrence of severe neutropenia (10 vs. 27%) and febrile neutropenia (6 vs. 13%), but produced more gastric side effects (8 vs. 3%) and diarrhea (13 vs. 8%). QoL did not differ across the two arms. Median PFS was 6.6 months in the OXXEL, and 6.5 months in the OXAFAFU arm (HR = 1.12, P = 0.354). Median overall survival was 16.0 and 17.1 months (HR = 1.01, P = 0.883).

Conclusions: OXXEL and OXAFAFU regimens were equally active in metastatic colorectal cancer. The choice should be based on patient preference and on pharmacoeconomic evaluations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Estimated progression-free survival curves according to arms of treatment (OXAFAFU squares, OXXEL circles)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Estimated overall survival curves according to arms of treatment (OXAFAFU squares, OXXEL circles)

References

    1. Becouarn Y, Ychou M, Ducreux M et al (1998) Phase II trial of oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 16:2739–2744 - PubMed
    1. Borner MM, Dietrich D, Stupp R et al (2002) Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in first- and second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:1759–1766 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Twelves C et al (2004) XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin): active first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:2084–2091 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cassidy J, Douillard J-Y, Twelves C et al (2006) Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes’ C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial. Br J Cancer 94:1122–1129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cassidy J, Clarke S, Diaz-Rubio E et al. (2007) XELOX vs FOLFOX4: efficacy results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised phase III trial in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium (abstr 270)

Publication types

MeSH terms