Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli
- PMID: 18719987
- PMCID: PMC2739402
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-008-9402-5
Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli
Abstract
Although experimental studies support that men generally respond more to visual sexual stimuli than do women, there is substantial variability in this effect. One potential source of variability is the type of stimuli used that may not be of equal interest to both men and women whose preferences may be dependent upon the activities and situations depicted. The current study investigated whether men and women had preferences for certain types of stimuli. We measured the subjective evaluations and viewing times of 15 men and 30 women (15 using hormonal contraception) to sexually explicit photos. Heterosexual participants viewed 216 pictures that were controlled for the sexual activity depicted, gaze of the female actor, and the proportion of the image that the genital region occupied. Men and women did not differ in their overall interest in the stimuli, indicated by equal subjective ratings and viewing times, although there were preferences for specific types of pictures. Pictures of the opposite sex receiving oral sex were rated as least sexually attractive by all participants and they looked longer at pictures showing the female actor's body. Women rated pictures in which the female actor was looking indirectly at the camera as more attractive, while men did not discriminate by female gaze. Participants did not look as long at close-ups of genitals, and men and women on oral contraceptives rated genital images as less sexually attractive. Together, these data demonstrate sex-specific preferences for specific types of stimuli even when, across stimuli, overall interest was comparable.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women.Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Aug;38(4):551-8. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9246-4. Epub 2007 Oct 18. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 17943432
-
Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: an eye-tracking study in men and women.Horm Behav. 2007 Apr;51(4):524-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Feb 12. Horm Behav. 2007. PMID: 17362952
-
Visual Attention to Sexual Stimuli in Mostly Heterosexuals.Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Jul;48(5):1371-1385. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-1419-4. Epub 2019 May 29. Arch Sex Behav. 2019. PMID: 31144215
-
Sex differences in visual attention to sexually explicit videos: a preliminary study.J Sex Med. 2009 Apr;6(4):1011-1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01031.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17. J Sex Med. 2009. PMID: 19175861
-
Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review.Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Apr;37(2):206-18. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9217-9. Epub 2007 Aug 1. Arch Sex Behav. 2008. PMID: 17668311 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women's Sexual Arousal.Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Jul;49(5):1505-1516. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Arch Sex Behav. 2020. PMID: 32026223 Free PMC article.
-
Partner Status Influences Women's Interest in the Opposite Sex.Hum Nat. 2009 Mar 1;20(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s12110-009-9056-6. Hum Nat. 2009. PMID: 20161078 Free PMC article.
-
Neural correlates of emotion processing comparing antidepressants and exogenous oxytocin in postpartum depressed women: An exploratory study.PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217764. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31150502 Free PMC article.
-
Lower sexual interest in postpartum women: relationship to amygdala activation and intranasal oxytocin.Horm Behav. 2013 Jan;63(1):114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Oct 18. Horm Behav. 2013. PMID: 23085496 Free PMC article.
-
Visual Sexual Stimuli-Cue or Reward? A Perspective for Interpreting Brain Imaging Findings on Human Sexual Behaviors.Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 15;10:402. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00402. eCollection 2016. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27574507 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alexander MG, Fisher TD. Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research. 2003;40:27–35. - PubMed
-
- Bancroft J, Sherwin BB, Alexander G, Davidson DW, Walker A. Oral contraceptives, androgens, and the sexuality of young women: A comparison of sexual experience, sexual attitudes, and gender role in oral contraceptive users and nonusers. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1991;20:105–120. - PubMed
-
- Brown M. Viewing time of pornography. Journal of Psychology. 1979;102:83–95.
-
- Carlstrom K, Lunell NO, Zador G. Serum levels of FSH, LH, estradiol-17 beta, and progesterone following the administration of a combined oral contraception containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 1978;9:304–311. - PubMed
-
- Chivers ML, Rieger G, Latty E, Bailey JM. A sex difference in the specificity of arousal. Psychological Science. 2004;15:736–744. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources