Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct 24;283(43):29424-32.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802475200. Epub 2008 Aug 22.

Regulation of postsynaptic RapGAP SPAR by Polo-like kinase 2 and the SCFbeta-TRCP ubiquitin ligase in hippocampal neurons

Affiliations

Regulation of postsynaptic RapGAP SPAR by Polo-like kinase 2 and the SCFbeta-TRCP ubiquitin ligase in hippocampal neurons

Xiaolu L Ang et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) regulates synaptic function, but little is known about specific UPP targets and mechanisms in mammalian synapses. We report here that the SCF(beta-TRCP) complex, a multisubunit E3 ubiquitin ligase, targets the postsynaptic spine-associated Rap GTPase activating protein (SPAR) for degradation in neurons. SPAR degradation by SCF(beta-TRCP) depended on the activity-inducible protein kinase Polo-like kinase 2 (Plk2). In the presence of Plk2, SPAR physically associated with the SCF(beta-TRCP) complex through a canonical phosphodegron. In hippocampal neurons, disruption of the SCF(beta-TRCP) complex by overexpression of dominant interfering beta-TRCP or Cul1 constructs prevented Plk2-dependent degradation of SPAR. Our results identify a specific E3 ubiquitin ligase that mediates degradation of a key postsynaptic regulator of synaptic morphology and function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Plk2-induced SPAR degradation requires a Cul1-based E3 Ubligase. A-C, dominant negative Cul1 constructs block Plk2-dependent loss of SPAR in hippocampal neurons. Dissociated rat hippocampal neurons (DIV16) were transfected with dominant negative Cullin plasmids (B and C) or a control plasmid (A) and super-infected 2 days later with FLAG-tagged Plk2 driven by Sindbis virus (Sin-Plk2). Neurons were fixed ∼18 h post-infection and immunostained for endogenous SPAR and infected Plk2. Transfected cells were identified during image acquisition by the presence of a co-transfected “fill” protein (GFP, seen in the first column of images). SPAR (green) and Plk2 (red) were pseudo-colored for illustrative purposes after image analysis. Arrows point to cells that are both transfected and infected; arrowheads point to cells that are infected only. Yellow indicates the presence of both SPAR and Plk2 staining. D and E, quantification of SPAR immunostaining in somatic and proximal dendritic regions as integrated immunofluorescence intensity per area in cells transfected with indicated plasmids and/or infected with Plk2 Sindbis virus (Sin-Plk2), normalized to nearby untransfected (untr) cells. Values represent the mean ± S.E., n > 17 cells for all conditions, ***, p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test (E).
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
SPAR physically associates with the SCFβ-TRCP complex. A, Plk2-dependent loss of SPAR. HEK293T cells were transfected with 1 μg of pCMV-HA-Plk2 (lane 1), 1 μg of pCMV-myc-SPAR (lane 3), or 1 μg of pCMV-myc-SPAR together with either 1 μg of catalytically inactive pCMV-HA-Plk2D201A (lane 2) or increasing amounts of pCMV-HA-Plk2WT (0.3, 1, or 2 μg) (lanes 4-6). The total amount of transfected DNA was kept constant among all conditions with use of empty vector. Whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with Myc antibody to assess myc-SPAR levels. B, dominant negative versions of Cul1 and β-TRCP stabilize SPAR. pCMV-myc-SPAR (0.5 μg) and pCMV-HA-Plk2D201A/WT (1 μg) (catalytically inactive, lane 1; wild type, lanes 2-9) were co-expressed in HEK293T cells with 2.5 μg of either empty vector, dominant negative Cullins, or dominant negative F-box proteins. Changes in the abundance of myc-SPAR were determined by immunoblotting with anti-Myc antibody. C, F-box protein interaction screen. pCMV-myc-SPAR (0.6 μg), pCMV-HA-Plk2WT/K108M (0.6 μg), and pCMV-DNCul1 (2 μg) were co-expressed as shown with pCMV-GST (lane 2) or the indicated F-box proteins as GST fusions (0.6 μg) (lanes 3-22) in HEK293T cells seeded in 6-well plates. After 24 h, cell extracts were used for GSH-Sepharose pull-down assays, and proteins were immunoblotted with anti-GST and anti-Myc antibodies. Crude lysates were blotted as an input control. D, coimmunoprecipitation of SPAR and Plk2. Extracts of HEK293T cells transfected with pCMV-DNCul1 and pCMV-myc-SPAR (lane 1), pCMV-HA-Plk2 (lane 2), or both (lane 3) were immunoprecipitated using anti-Myc or anti-HA antibodies as indicated. E, formation of a SPAR·Plk2·β-TRCP·Cul1 complex with active Plk2. Lysates from cells transfected with pCMV-myc-SPAR (0.5 μg), pCMV-HA-Plk2WT/D201A (0.5 μg), pCMV-GST-β-TRCP (0.5 μg), and pCMV-FLAG-Cul11-452 (2 μg), as indicated, were incubated with GSH-Sepharose and immunoblotted with anti-Myc, anti-HA, anti-GST, and anti-FLAG antibodies as shown. Lanes 1-4 show lysates (6% of input of the GSH-Sepharose binding reactions).
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
SCFβ-TRCP regulates Plk2-dependent SPAR abundance, turnover, and promotes its ubiquitination. A and B, depletion of β-TRCP by RNAi protects GFP-SPAR from degradation in individual HEK293T cells. The indicated plasmids were transfected with pCMV-RFP as a co-transfection marker into HEK293T cells. After 96 h, cells were fixed and imaged for GFP-SPAR and RFP expression (A) and quantified as the percentage of RFP expressing cells that also expressed GFP-SPAR (B). Values represent the mean ± S.E. from three independent experiments, derived from analysis of 400 cells per experiment per condition (n = 1200 cells per condition). **, p < 0.01; NS, not significant; one-way analysis of variance, compared with control condition (pRSP+Plk2D/A). C and D, depletion of β-TRCP by RNAi stabilizes SPAR abundance and turnover in the presence of Plk2 activity. HEK293T cells were transfected with vectors expressing myc-SPAR (0.5 μg), WT, or catalytically inactive HA-Plk2 (D/A) (1 μg), and the indicated shRNA vector carrying a puromycin resistance selection marker (2.5 μg). 36 h post-transfection, cells were incubated with media containing 1 μg/ml puromycin to enrich for shRNA expression. Extracts were subsequently examined by immunoblotting 96 h post-transfection as indicated. Endogenous Cdc25A was probed to control for successful knockdown of β-TRCP. In panel D, HEK293T cells were transfected in an identical fashion to panel C, except that 24 h post-transfection the transfected cells were split among 5 wells in puromycin-containing media. After 48 h of puromycin selection, cells were treated with 25 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) and harvested at the indicated times before immunoblotting. E, expression of β-TRCP promotes Plk2-mediated SPAR ubiquitination. HEK293T cells were transfected with myc-SPAR (1 μg), His-Ub (1 μg), HA-Plk2 (1.5 μg, wild type or D201A), and GST or GST-β-TRCP (4.5 μg). Twenty hours post-transfection cells were treated with 25 μm MG-132 for 5 h and lysed in buffer containing 10 mm N-ethylmaleimide. Myc-SPAR was purified with c-Myc 9E10-agarose, resolved on 6% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE gel, and immunoblotted (IB) with anti-Myc antibodies. IP, immunoprecipitates.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
A candidateβ-TRCP phosphodegron in SPAR. A, schematic representation of SPAR domains and SPAR fragments: actin-binding domains (Act1 and Act2), RapGAP, PDZ, and guanylate kinase binding (GKBD) domain. The candidate DSGIDT phosphodegron motif (residues 1304-1309) identified in the Act2 domain of SPAR closely resembles the consensus β-TRCP phosphodegron (inset). Boundaries of generated C-terminal fragments of SPAR are depicted; C-1, C-2, and Act2 fragments contain the putative phosphodegron motif, whereas C-3 does not. B and C, SPAR fragments spanning the β-TRCP phosphodegron bind to β-TRCP. HEK293T cells were transfected with vectors expressing SPAR fragments C-1, C-2, C-3 (B) or Act2 (C) (0.6 μg) either alone or with pCMV-GST or pCMV-GST-β-TRCP (0.6 μg). In addition, pCMV-HA-Plk2WT/K108M (0.6 μg) and DNCul1 (2 μg) were co-transfected as indicated. After 24 h, cell extracts were used for GSH-Sepharose pulldown assays, and proteins were immunoblotted with Myc antibodies. Crude lysates were blotted as an input control. D and E, phosphodegron-dependent binding to β-TRCP. Constructs expressing point mutations (S1305A, T1309A) in full-length SPAR (E) and the Act2 fragment (D) (myc-SPARAA or myc-Act2AA, 0.6 μg) were transfected into HEK293T cells along with pCMV-HA-Plk2WT/D201A (0.6 μg), pCMV-DNCul1 (2 μg), and pCMV-GST or pCMV-GST-β-TRCP (0.6 μg) as indicated. Cell lysates were incubated with GSH-Sepharose and immunoblotted with Myc antibodies. Crude extracts were resolved to control for input. Wild type constructs expressing myc-SPAR and myc-Act2 were used for comparison as a positive control for interaction with GST-β-TRCP. F, SPAR associates with endogenous SCFβ-TRCP1 complex in the presence of active Plk2 and dependent upon its phosphodegron. Constructs expressing full-length myc-SPAR (WT or AA) were co-expressed in HEK293T cells with active (WT) or catalytically inactive Plk2 (D201A). Before lysis and immunoprecipitation with 9E10-agarose, cells were treated with proteasome inhibitor MG-132 (25 μm) for 5 h. Proteins bound to 9E10-agarose were analyzed via immunoblotting using Myc antibodies and antibodies that recognized endogenous β-TRCP1 and Cul1. Myc-SPAR-C3, a fragment of SPAR that does not contain the phosphodegron served as a negative control, and myc-Cdc25A, a known target of SCFβ-TRCP1, served as a positive control. G, phosphodegron-dependent degradation of SPAR by Plk2 and β-TRCP. Myc-SPARWT and myc-SPARAA abundance was compared by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies in HEK293T cells in the absence and presence of pCMV-HA-Plk2 in the background of empty vector or β-TRCPΔF.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Regulation of SPAR degradation in hippocampal neurons through the SCFβ-TRCP complex. A-C, dominant negative β-TRCP constructs block Plk2-dependent loss of SPAR in hippocampal neurons. As in Fig. 1, DIV16 dissociated rat hippocampal neurons were transfected with dominant negative β-TRCP plasmids (A and B) or control SkpΔF plasmid (C) and superinfected 2 days later with FLAG-tagged Plk2 driven by Sindbis virus (Sin-Plk2). Arrows point to cells that are both transfected and infected; arrowheads point to cells that are infected only. Yellow indicates the presence of both SPAR and Plk2 staining. D and E, quantification of SPAR immunostaining in somatic and proximal dendritic regions, as in Fig. 1. Values represent the mean ± S.E. n = 25-37 cells for all constructs in panel D; *, p < 0.05 indicates significant difference from theoretical mean of 100%, Student's t test (D). For panel E, n = 19-37 cells (infected only), n = 13-28 cells (infected and transfected), ***, p < 0.001, Mann Whitney test.

References

    1. Kasai, H., Matsuzaki, M., Noguchi, J., Yasumatsu, N., and Nakahara, H. (2003) Trends Neurosci. 26 360-368 - PubMed
    1. Tada, T., and Sheng, M. (2006) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16 95-101 - PubMed
    1. Bonhoeffer, T., and Yuste, R. (2002) Neuron 35 1019-1027 - PubMed
    1. Carlisle, H. J., and Kennedy, M. B. (2005) Trends Neurosci. 28 182-187 - PubMed
    1. Pak, D. T., Yang, S., Rudolph-Correia, S., Kim, E., and Sheng, M. (2001) Neuron 31 289-303 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms