Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Nov;37(6):628-33.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn141. Epub 2008 Aug 23.

Home versus day rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial

Maria Crotty  1 , Lynne C Giles, Julie Halbert, Julie Harding, Michelle Miller
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Home versus day rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial

Maria Crotty et al. Age Ageing. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: to assess the effect of home versus day rehabilitation on patient outcomes.

Design: randomised controlled trial.

Setting: post-hospital rehabilitation.

Participants: two hundred and twenty-nine hospitalised patients referred for ambulatory rehabilitation.

Interventions: hospital-based day rehabilitation programme versus home-based rehabilitation programme.

Main outcome measures: at 3 months, information was collected on hospital readmission, transfer to residential care, functional level, quality of life, carer stress and carer quality of life. At 6 months, place of residence, hospital re-admissions and mortality status were collected.

Results: there were significant improvements in the functional outcomes from baseline to 3 months for all participants. At discharge, carers of patients in day hospital reported higher Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) scores in comparison to home rehabilitation carers (4.95 versus 3.56, P = 0.047). Patients in day hospital had double the risk of readmission compared to those in home rehabilitation (RR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.9). This effect persisted at 6 months.

Conclusions: day hospital patients are more likely to be readmitted to hospital possibly due to increased access to admitting medical staff. This small trial favours the home as a better site for post-hospital rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment flow of participants
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Meijer R, van Limbeek J. Early supported discharge: a valuable alternative for some stroke patients. Lancet. 2005;365:455–6. - PubMed
    1. Jolly K, Taylor RS, Lip GY, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation and usual care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2006;111:343–51. - PubMed
    1. Schwartzman K, Duquette G, Zaoude M, et al. Respiratory day hospital: a novel approach to acute respiratory care. CMAJ. 2001;165:1067–71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron ID, Crotty M, Currie C, et al. Geriatric rehabilitation following fractures in older people: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:1–111. - PubMed
    1. Caplan GA, Brown A. Post acute care: can hospitals do better with less? Aust Health Rev. 1997;20:43–54. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms