Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening
- PMID: 18725824
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817fdf46
Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized. Effective methods to increase screening use are needed. This study sought to determine the impact of tailored navigation on CRC screening in primary care.
Methods: The study included 154 primary care practice patients who were 50 or more years of age, were eligible for CRC screening, and had an office visit within 2 years before study initiation. Baseline telephone survey data were collected on participant sociodemographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, and screening test [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or colonoscopy] decision stage. By comparing decision stage data, we identified that test with the highest decision stage (ie, preferred screening test). Participants who preferred FOBT were sent an FOBT kit and a reminder. Those preferring colonoscopy were sent colonoscopy instructions. After this mailing, a study patient navigator made a telephone call to guide participants towards screening. Six-month end point survey and medical records data were obtained. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of screening and of change in preferred screening test decision stage.
Results: At end point, 63 (41%) study participants had screened. From baseline to end point, overall screening preference increased for 75 (63%) participants. Age and perceived salience and coherence (ie, screening is important and sensible) were positive, significant predictors of screening use (P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively); while only age predicted change in overall screening preference (P = 0.03).
Conclusions: Study participant screening use and preference increased. Age and attitudes predicted outcomes. Randomized trials are needed to determine intervention impact at the population level.
Comment in
-
Evaluating approaches to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: lessons learned from pilot studies in diverse primary care settings.Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S97-102. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817eb346. Med Care. 2008. PMID: 18725840 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A provider intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening in county health centers.Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S109-16. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d3fcf. Med Care. 2008. PMID: 18725822 Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal cancer screening: physician attitudes and practices.WMJ. 2002;101(5):39-43. WMJ. 2002. PMID: 12239980
-
Implementing an intervention to promote colon cancer screening through e-mail over the Internet: lessons learned from a pilot study.Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S117-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181805e3c. Med Care. 2008. PMID: 18725823 Clinical Trial.
-
Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer.Endoscopy. 2009 Mar;41(3):200-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119626. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19280531 Review.
-
Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: a review.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 May;17(3):221-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00834.x. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008. PMID: 18419625 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinicians' panel management self-efficacy to support their patients' smoking cessation and hypertension control needs.Transl Behav Med. 2015 Mar;5(1):68-76. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0287-7. Transl Behav Med. 2015. PMID: 25729455 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.Health Educ Behav. 2013 Aug;40(4):449-57. doi: 10.1177/1090198112459514. Epub 2012 Oct 19. Health Educ Behav. 2013. PMID: 23086556 Free PMC article.
-
Telephone reminder call in addition to mailing notification improved the acceptance rate of colonoscopy in patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test.Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Nov;56(11):3137-42. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1720-0. Epub 2011 Jun 18. Dig Dis Sci. 2011. PMID: 21688010
-
Eliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take?J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Feb;22(1):83-100. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0023. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011. PMID: 21317508 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion.Prev Med Rep. 2018 Feb 2;9:138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.004. eCollection 2018 Mar. Prev Med Rep. 2018. PMID: 29527466 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous