Lessons learnt from many years of experience using anti-D in humans for prevention of RhD immunization and haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn
- PMID: 18727626
- PMCID: PMC2561090
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03735.x
Lessons learnt from many years of experience using anti-D in humans for prevention of RhD immunization and haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn
Abstract
For 40 years prophylactic anti-D has been given to D-negative women after parturition to prevent haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Monoclonal or recombinant anti-D may provide alternatives to the current plasma-derived polyclonal IgG anti-D, although none of them have yet proved as effective in phase 1 clinical trials. The variation in efficacy of the antibodies may have been influenced by heterogeneity in glycosylation of anti-D produced from different cell lines. Some aspects of the conduct of the human studies, most notably the use of low doses of anti-D and target D positive red cells in vivo, may aid the design of the clinical development of other immunomodulatory drugs in order to minimize adverse effects.
References
-
- Bowman J. Thirty-five years of Rh prophylaxis. Transfusion. 2003;43:1661–6. - PubMed
-
- Colin Y, Chérif-Zahar B, Van Kim L, et al. Genetic basis of the RhD-positive and RhD-negative blood group polymorphism as determined by Southern analysis. Blood. 1991;78:2747–52. - PubMed
-
- Freda VJ, Gorman JG, Pollack W. Successful prevention of experimental Rh sensitization in man with an anti-Rh gamma2-globulin antibody preparation. A preliminary report. Transfusion. 1964;4:26–32. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
