Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Feb;31(1):1-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1991.tb02753.x.

Urinary oestriol assay for monitoring fetoplacental function

Affiliations
Review

Urinary oestriol assay for monitoring fetoplacental function

N Beischer et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Feb.

Abstract

During the years 1971-1984 urinary oestriol excretion was tested in 51,427 patients (group 1). One or more low oestriol value was found in 10.7% of patients; in this group the stillbirth rate was 6.8 times higher, the neonatal death rate 3.8 times higher, and fetal growth retardation rate 3.5 times higher than in patients with normal oestriol values (all p less than 0.00001). During the years 1985-1989 a further 20,635 patients were tested (group 2) and 7.6% had one or more low oestriol value. The perinatal mortality rate in patients with normal oestriol excretion fell from 0.8% in group 1 to 0.5% in group 2 (p less than 0.005), and in patients with low oestriol excretion from 4.2% in group 1 to 2.4% in group 2 (p less than 0.002). However, patients in group 2 with low oestriol values still had significantly unfavourable results, compared to those with normal oestriol values--stillbirth rate 3.3 times higher, neonatal death rate 4.6 times higher, and fetal growth retardation rate 3.2 times higher (all p less than 0.00001). Intravenous dextrose and aminoacid infusions were given to 967 patients who had persistently low oestriol values in spite of rest in hospital, in an attempt to correct fetoplacental function; the perinatal mortality rate was 0.9% in the 660 (68.3%) who responded favourably, and 9.8% in the 307 (31.7%) who did not respond (p less than 0.0001).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources