Comparison of nicardipine and sodium nitroprusside in the treatment of paroxysmal hypertension following aortocoronary bypass surgery

Abstract

In an open, randomized, multicenter trial, intravenous nicardipine was compared with sodium nitroprusside in 74 patients with hypertension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg) following coronary artery bypass surgery. Nicardipine was administered as a 2.5- to 12.5-mg bolus followed by a 2 to 4 mg/h infusion, and nitroprusside as a 0.5 to 6.0 micrograms/kg/min infusion. The aim was to reduce MAP to less than 90 mm Hg within 50 minutes and maintain it stable at 85 +/- 5 mm Hg. Nicardipine was effective in 35 of 38 patients (92%), and nitroprusside in 29 of 36 (81%) (NS). The decrease in MAP was not statistically different, but time until reaching the therapeutic end-point was shorter with nicardipine (P less than 0.01). Significant differences follow: increase in heart rate and decreases in mean pulmonary artery, right atrial, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were more marked with nitroprusside (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively), whereas elevation of cardiac index and depression of systemic vascular resistance were more marked with nicardipine (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively). Postreduction MAP was more stable with nicardipine, 51% +/- 24% of readings falling within the range 85 +/- 5 mm Hg versus 41% +/- 18% on nitroprusside (P = 0.058). Dose adjustment during the following 24 hours was less frequent with nicardipine, 1.1 +/- 1.6 versus 2.7 +/- 2.6 (P less than 0.01). Transfused blood volume was lower with nicardipine (924 +/- 644 mL) than nitroprusside (1,306 +/- 901 mL) (P = 0.08), despite similar postoperative blood losses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)