Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial

Psychometric characteristics of the memory for intentions screening test

Steven Paul Woods et al. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

The construct of prospective memory (ProM), or "remembering to remember," is hypothesized to play a critical role in normal activities of daily living and has increasingly been the focus of clinical research over the past 10 years. However, the assessment of ProM as part of routine clinical care is presently hampered by the paucity of psychometrically sound, validated ProM tests available in the neuropsychological literature. The Memory for Intentions Screening Test (MIST; Raskin, 2004) is a user-friendly, comprehensive measure of ProM that demonstrates preliminary evidence of construct validity. Extending this research, this study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the MIST in a sample of 67 healthy adults. Despite a mildly restricted range of scores, results revealed excellent inter-rater reliability, adequate split-half reliability, and satisfactory inter-relationships between the MIST summary score, subscales, and error types. Analysis of demographic correlates showed that the MIST was independently associated with both age and education, but not with sex or ethnicity. These findings broadly support the psychometric properties of the MIST, specifically its reliability and expected relationships with demographic characteristics. Recommendations are provided regarding future research to enhance the clinical usefulness of the MIST.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anastasi A. Psychological testing. 6. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc; 1988.
    1. Carey CL, Woods SP, Rippeth JD, Heaton RK, Grant I The HNRC Group. Prospective memory in HIV-1 infection. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2006;28:536–548. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Tests: A Review of the Literature on Everyday Cognitive Skills. Neuropsychology Review. 2003;13:181–197. - PubMed
    1. Craik FIM. A functional account of age differences in memory. In: Klix F, Hagendorf H, editors. Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities: Mechanisms and Performances. New York, NY: Elsevier Science; 1986. pp. 409–422.
    1. Delis DC, Jacobson M, Bondi MW, Hamilton JM, Salmon DP. The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: Lessons from memory assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2003;9:936–946. - PubMed

Publication types