Effects of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel and telmisartan on disability and cognitive function after recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke in the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) trial: a double-blind, active and placebo-controlled study
- PMID: 18757238
- PMCID: PMC2772657
- DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70198-4
Effects of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel and telmisartan on disability and cognitive function after recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke in the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) trial: a double-blind, active and placebo-controlled study
Erratum in
- Lancet Neurol. 2008 Nov;7(11):985
Abstract
Background: The treatment of ischaemic stroke with neuroprotective drugs has been unsuccessful, and whether these compounds can be used to reduce disability after recurrent stroke is unknown. The putative neuroprotective effects of antiplatelet compounds and the angiotensin II receptor antagonist telmisartan were investigated in the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) trial.
Methods: Patients who had had an ischaemic stroke were randomly assigned in a two by two factorial design to receive either 25 mg aspirin (ASA) and 200 mg extended-release dipyridamole (ER-DP) twice a day or 75 mg clopidogrel once a day, and either 80 mg telmisartan or placebo once per day. The predefined endpoints for this substudy were disability after a recurrent stroke, assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Barthel index at 3 months, and cognitive function, assessed with the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score at 4 weeks after randomisation and at the penultimate visit. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153062.
Findings: 20,332 patients (mean age 66 years) were randomised and followed-up for a median of 2.4 years. Recurrent strokes occurred in 916 (9%) patients randomly assigned to ASA with ER-DP and 898 (9%) patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel; 880 (9%) patients randomly assigned to telmisartan and 934 (9%) patients given placebo had recurrent strokes. mRS scores were not statistically different in patients with recurrent stroke who were treated with ASA and ER-DP versus clopidogrel (p=0.38), or with telmisartan versus placebo (p=0.61). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with recurrent stroke with a good outcome, as measured with the Barthel index, across all treatment groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the median MMSE scores, the percentage of patients with an MMSE score of 24 points or less, the percentage of patients with a drop in MMSE score of 3 points or more between 1 month and the penultimate visit, and the number of patients with dementia among the treatment groups. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with cognitive impairment or dementia among the treatment groups.
Interpretation: Disability due to recurrent stroke and cognitive decline in patients with ischaemic stroke were not different between the two antiplatelet regimens and were not affected by the preventive use of telmisartan.
Figures



Comment in
-
What do the results of the PRoFESS trial teach us?Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):860-2. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70199-6. Epub 2008 Aug 29. Lancet Neurol. 2008. PMID: 18757237 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two antithrombotic regimens (a fixed-dose combination of extended-release dipyridamole plus ASA with clopidogrel) and telmisartan versus placebo in patients with strokes: the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes Trial (PRoFESS).Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(5-6):368-80. doi: 10.1159/000100105. Epub 2007 Feb 26. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007. PMID: 17337887 Clinical Trial.
-
Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke.N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1238-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805002. Epub 2008 Aug 27. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18753638 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with silent brain infarction in the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) imaging substudy.Stroke. 2012 Feb;43(2):350-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.631739. Epub 2012 Jan 19. Stroke. 2012. PMID: 22267825 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Review of antiplatelet therapy in secondary prevention of cerebrovascular events: a need for direct comparisons between antiplatelet agents.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Sep;10(3):153-61. doi: 10.1177/107424840501000302. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2005. PMID: 16211203 Review.
-
The PRoFESS trial: future impact on secondary stroke prevention.Expert Rev Neurother. 2007 Sep;7(9):1085-91. doi: 10.1586/14737175.7.9.1085. Expert Rev Neurother. 2007. PMID: 17868007 Review.
Cited by
-
Antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in cerebrovascular disease.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):609-22. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.111. Epub 2016 Aug 4. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27489191 Review.
-
Antiplatelets and Vascular Dementia: A Systematic Review.J Aging Res. 2022 Sep 19;2022:9780067. doi: 10.1155/2022/9780067. eCollection 2022. J Aging Res. 2022. PMID: 36245899 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do P2Y12 receptor inhibitors prescribed poststroke modify the risk of cognitive disorder or dementia? Protocol for a target trial using multiple national Swedish registries.BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e058244. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058244. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35534077 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy versus safety: the dilemma of using novel platelet inhibitors for the treatment of patients with ischemic stroke and coronary artery disease.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014 May 2;10:321-9. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S39216. eCollection 2014. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014. PMID: 24851050 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Purinergic receptor P2RY12-dependent microglial closure of the injured blood-brain barrier.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):1074-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520398113. Epub 2016 Jan 11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016. PMID: 26755608 Free PMC article.
References
-
- De Keyser J, Uyttenboogaart M, Koch MW, et al. Neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Belg. 2005;105:144–48. - PubMed
-
- Schabitz WR, Fisher M. Perspectives on neuroprotective stroke therapy. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006;34:1271–76. - PubMed
-
- Hill MD. Stroke: the dashed hopes of neuroprotection. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:2–3. - PubMed
-
- Zheng Z, Schwab S, Grau A, Berger C. Neuroprotection by early and delayed treatment of acute stroke with high dose aspirin. Brain. 2007;1186:275–80. - PubMed
-
- Gomes I. Aspirin: a neuroprotective agent at high doses? Natl Med J India. 1998;11:14–17. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical