Psychiatric disorders among detained youths: a comparison of youths processed in juvenile court and adult criminal court
- PMID: 18757588
- PMCID: PMC2718561
- DOI: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.9.965
Psychiatric disorders among detained youths: a comparison of youths processed in juvenile court and adult criminal court
Abstract
Objective: All 50 states and the District of Columbia have legal mechanisms to try juveniles as adults in criminal court. This study examined the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among youths transferred to adult criminal court and youths processed in the juvenile court.
Methods: Participants were a stratified random sample of 1,829 youths, ten to 18 years of age, who were arrested and detained in Chicago. Data from version 2.3 of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children are presented for 1,715 youths, 13 to 18 years of age, including 1,440 youths processed in juvenile court and 275 youths processed in adult criminal court.
Results: Males, African Americans, Hispanics, and older youths had greater odds of being processed in adult criminal court than females, non-Hispanic whites, and younger youths, even after the analyses controlled for felony-level violent crime. Among youths processed in adult criminal court, 68% had at least one psychiatric disorder and 43% had two or more types of disorders. Prevalence rates and the number of comorbid types of disorders were not significantly different between youths processed in adult criminal court and those processed in juvenile court. Among youths processed in adult criminal court, those sentenced to prison had significantly greater odds than those receiving a less severe sentence of having a disruptive behavior disorder, a substance use disorder, or comorbid affective and anxiety disorders.
Conclusions: Community and correctional systems must be prepared to provide psychiatric services to youths transferred to adult criminal court and especially to youths sentenced to prison. When developing and implementing services, psychiatric service providers must also consider the disproportionate representation of individuals from racial-ethnic minority groups in the transfer process.
Comment in
-
Tough on crime or tougher on those who need care?Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Sep;59(9):955. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.9.955. Psychiatr Serv. 2008. PMID: 18757585 No abstract available.
References
-
- Griffin P. Technical Assistance to the Juvenile Court: Special Project Bulletin. Pittsburg, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice; 2003. Trying and sentencing juveniles as adults: an analysis of state transfer and blended sentencing laws.
-
- Puzzanchera C, Stahl A, Finnegan TA, et al. Pittsburg PA: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2003. Juvenile Court Statistics 1999.
-
- General Accounting Office. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; 1995. Juvenile Justice: Juveniles Processed in Criminal Court and Case Dispositions.
-
- Snyder HN, Sickmund M, Poe-Yamagata E. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; 2000. Juvenile Transfers to Criminal Court in the 1990’s: Lessons Learned from Four Studies.
-
- Salekin RT, Yff R, Neumann CS, et al. Juvenile transfer to adult courts: a look at the prototypes for dangerousness sophistication-maturity and amenability to treatment through a legal lens. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2002;8:373–410.
