Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 9;105(36):13367-72.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802788105. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

Microsecond acquisition of heterogeneous structure in the folding of a TIM barrel protein

Affiliations

Microsecond acquisition of heterogeneous structure in the folding of a TIM barrel protein

Ying Wu et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The earliest kinetic folding events for (betaalpha)(8) barrels reflect the appearance of off-pathway intermediates. Continuous-flow microchannel mixing methods interfaced to small-angle x-ray scattering (SAXS), circular dichroism (CD), time-resolved Förster resonant energy transfer (trFRET), and time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy (trFLAN) have been used to directly monitor global and specific dimensional properties of the partially folded state in the microsecond time range for a representative (betaalpha)(8) barrel protein. Within 150 micros, the alpha-subunit of Trp synthase (alphaTS) experiences a global collapse and the partial formation of secondary structure. The time resolution of the folding reaction was enhanced with trFRET and trFLAN to show that, within 30 micros, a distinct and autonomous partially collapsed structure has already formed in the N-terminal and central regions but not in the C-terminal region. A distance distribution analysis of the trFRET data confirmed the presence of a heterogeneous ensemble that persists for several hundreds of microseconds. Ready access to locally folded, stable substructures may be a hallmark of repeat-module proteins and the source of early kinetic traps in these very common motifs. Their folding free-energy landscapes should be elaborated to capture this source of frustration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Structure of αTS and location of chromophores used as FRET probes. X-ray crystal structure of αTS [PDB ID code:1BKS (49)] with FRET pairs 15-54, 15-134, 168-212 and 15-212 highlighted. The figure was prepared by using PyMol (50).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
SAXS and CD spectra of αTS as a function of refolding time. (A) Kratky plots at 150 μs (dotted line), 1 ms (dashed line), and 5 ms (dotted-dashed line). The unfolded Kratky plot recorded at 6 M urea (solid line), normalized to the concentration used for the kinetic data, is shown for reference. The Rg of the native state of αTS is 18.1 Å (51). Refolding was initiated by a urea concentration dilution from 6 to 0.6 M. The final protein concentration was 1 mg·ml−1. (Inset) Dependence of Rg on refolding time. Each scattering curve in A and time point in the Inset represents a total accumation time of ≈5 s. (B) CD spectra of αTS at various refolding times. Spectra at 150 μs (green open circles) and 5 ms (blue open circles), acquired after an 8–0.8 M urea concentration jump, are compared with the native spectrum (red open circles), the unfolded spectrum recorded at 8 M urea (black open circles) and the unfolded spectrum extrapolated to 0.8 M urea (black filled circles). The 150-μs spectrum, the native spectrum at 0.8 M urea, and the unfolded spectrum at 8 M urea were acquired with the same stock solutions in the continuous-flow mixer having a 127-μm optical path. The 5-ms time point spectrum was acquired by using the stopped-flow cuvette with a 1.5-mm optical path. Sample concentration was 60 μM for data recorded in the continuous-flow mixer and 10 μM for the stopped-flow data. The extrapolation of the unfolded baseline was performed by using published data and global fit parameters (52). Data were recorded at 21°C.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Average excited-state lifetimes of tryptophan as a function of refolding time following an 8 to 0.8 M urea concentration jump for four FRET pairs (green) and donor-only controls (red). (A) Pair 15-54. (B) Pair 15-134. (C) Pair 168-212. (D) Pair 15-212. (E–H) The corresponding FRET efficiencies are shown. The 〈EED〉app calculated from the Förster equation are indicated on the right vertical axis. The uncertainty in the average lifetimes, determined from controls in which no kinetics are present, is ≈0.015 ns. A consistent set of kinetics is observed in the average Trp lifetimes and the FRET efficiencies, suggesting that the observed kinetics are not an artifact of the mutations or acceptor chromophore labeling. Data were recorded at 21°C.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Gaussian distance distribution analysis of the time-resolved FRET data shown in Fig. 3. Results of global nonlinear least-squares analysis of tryptophan excited-state decays at various refolding time points using a double-Gaussian function are shown for the 15-212 (A) and 168-212 (B) samples. Distance distributions are shown at 53 (dark blue), 82 (light blue), 112 (green), 141 (yellow), and 170 (red) μs. Five pairs of donor-only and donor-acceptor-labeled decay traces were fit. The gray areas correspond to regions where the Trp–AEDEANS FRET pair is insensitive to distance changes. Based on the measured anisotropy of W212 (Fig. 5) and estimated anisotropy of AEDANS, values of κ2 can range between 0.4 and 1.5, however, leading to an uncertainty in the distances of approximately ±10%. The Gaussians in A have peaks at 20 and 41 Å and corresponding full-width at half-maximum of 2.7 and 14.3 Å. The Gaussians in B have peaks at 16 and 46 Å and corresponding full-width at half-maximum of 21 and 39 Å, respectively.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Time-resolved anisotropy as a function of refolding time for F22W (A) and F212W (B) after an 8–0.8 M urea concentration jump. TCSPC curves were acquired every 10.93 μs in refolding time, and refolding times are indicated by the color-coding shown on the right. The total flow rate was 17.5 ml·min−1 (1.75 ml·min−1 protein and 15.75 ml·min−1 buffer), which corresponds to a 32.65 μs·mm−1 linear flow velocity in the channel. Data were recorded at 21°C in 10 mM phosphate buffer containing 0.2 mM K2EDTA and 1 mM βME. Final protein concentration was 10 μM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brooks CL, Gruebele M, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG. Chemical physics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:11037–11038. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG. Theory of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004;14:70–75. - PubMed
    1. Jackson SE. How do small single-domain proteins fold? Fold Des. 1998;3:R81–R91. - PubMed
    1. Gillespie B, Plaxco KW. Using protein folding rates to test protein folding theories. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:837–859. - PubMed
    1. Istomin AY, Jacobs DJ, Livesay DR. On the role of structural class of a protein with two-state folding kinetics in determining correlations between its size, topology, and folding rate. Protein Sci. 2007;16:2564–2569. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources